<<  >> (p.9)
    Author Topic: Merit source observations  (Read 5485 times)
    JayJuanGee
    Legendary
    *
    Offline Offline

    Activity: 4172
    Merit: 12676


    Self-Custody is a right. Say no to "non-custodial"


    View Profile
    April 25, 2025, 03:23:06 AM
     #161

    About adding more merit source, some local boards and other general boards are very active with discussions and need merit source. For example, I don't see members getting merit on the altcoin discussion board, it's rare.
    Well, I have no problems with that.
    A merit is signal for effort.
    Putting effort in the altcoin board is detrimental to the user.
    Hence, better not to provide positive feedback loop on this.
    I might be joking on this, but I am very close to the harsh truth.

    Surprise... surprise... DANGER:   participation in shitcoin discussions may not result in the receipt of any merits, but also worse participation in shitcoin discussions may result in loss of funds and/or brain cells, too....

    1) Self-Custody is a right.  Resist being labelled as: "non-custodial" or "un-hosted."  2) ESG, KYC & AML are attack-vectors on Bitcoin to be avoided or minimized.  3) How much alt (shit)coin diversification is necessary? if you are into Bitcoin, then 0%......if you cannot control your gambling, then perhaps limit your alt(shit)coin exposure to less than 10% of your bitcoin size...Put BTC here: bc1q49wt0ddnj07wzzp6z7affw9ven7fztyhevqu9k
Page 8
Viewing Page: 9