Based on my understanding, I think it doesn't wrong to include a scammer or account received a lot negative feedback in trust list as long as they leave appropriate feedback, right?
Correct:
The fact that he turned out to be a scammer doesn't mean the feedback he left in the past, and the Trust list he currently has are suddenly wrong.
But:
For the record: I don't think scammers should stay on DefaultTrust (even though the rules don't mention it), but there's no rush.
But why many users are removing yogg from their trust list and some of them are put yogg in their distrust list ?
BPIP. It's make yogg's feedback now show as untrusted feedback and users who got negative feedback from yogg already clean now.
Based on my own Trust list (which doesn't include yogg), I still see yogg's feedback by default. If you believe (after verifying the accuracy of the feedback) that some of it deserves to stay, you can add a negative of your own.
Below is the list accounts were clean because yogg is removed from DT network (not full):
I checked them, and the feedback is for spam, asking loan, shitposting, retaliation feedback for shilling, advertising a "reward", fake project, ponzi spam, illegal stuff, scam, begging loan, shitposting, shitposting, account sales, spam, selling fake, missing coins from flawed script, scam without reference, shilling, being toxic.
I'd say more than half of these feedbacks shouldn't exist in their current form, and less than half of them deserve repeating.
