this was already discussed a million times (use search). Satoshi's account here is locked and besides posting on that account does NOT prove anything as bitcointalk database is not the safest thing in the world compared to a digital signature from a bitcoin private key!

Simply because of the fact that he is not Satoshi. A real Satoshi would never try to propogate his existence and nor will he try to prove that in court. A simple forum post would do wonders. But I think if satoshi would have ever decided to reveal his identity there were a lot of chances on which he would have revealed this but I think he would never ever do it now.

The answer to that is that Craig Wright is not the real Satoshi Nakamoto and he is a proven liar by the court. That is why he never logged into this forum and he never will. I am not sure though if Craig Wright made a claim that he is also the owner of the account we ascribed here to its founder Satoshi Nakamoto. Anyway, this man has been a big joke and the only person who believes that he is serious and very credible is himself and the surrounding people who got benefited with his generosity. Well, why don't we invite the man to have an account here and answer directly our many insinuations and allegations...it would have been an open-for-all circus.

A lot of threads were already made here in the forum. Craig Wright has been claiming to be Satoshi Nakamoto. If he's the real one, he should've proved it already a long time ago. 'Cause if you're the real one, you have a lot of backups and proof to give the public if you want them to believe in your claim. But why he can't do it? Because he's not the real Satoshi Nakamoto. But if you want to believe he's the real Satoshi, you're free to do so.

Theres a reason why he is not posting here or not even a part of this forum, and it is because he is fake!
Craig Wright is a dumbass lier. Will do anything just to take over and be known as the real creator of bitcoin but keeps on showing false evidences. This man deserves to be imprisoned to be real.

I am still quite surprised that you are a full member who joined this forum 2 years ago and still somehow think Craig wright could be Satoshi Nakamoto. This topic has been discussed countless times and no one has been able to sign a message from Satoshi's Alleged Bitcoin address.

That's one of the best ways to prove that he indeed is Satoshi. Besides Craig Wright looks to be a very greedy fella. He would have moved those bitcoins in Satoshi's bitcoin address to shill his Shitcoin cash by now if he was the one with the private keys 

Indeed, he need to suffer the consequences of his actions and learn from it. He's a fraud, who makes people believe that he is someone else when he's definitely not! he keeps on deceiving people up until now and I don't see a single reason why we should trust him. Of course he will do anything because he wanted to get the attention and the benefits, why would Satoshi reveal himself after all those years? what is the specific reason why he choose to hide his real identity before? it doesn't make any sense and for that reason we should be aware and cautious because scammers have different faces and they will hide it with their real intentions.

Yes the forum account wouldn't change anything unless Theymos confirm it .
And it is the best way to prove show us that he could use or have an access to Satoshi's BTC wallet.
But of course we already know that it would be impossible since it has been said so many times and have been proven that Craig is a fraud and he couldn't really give out a clear proof that he is indeed the real creator.

I know he's a liar, but I didn't know Satoshi's account was blocked. Now I understand why he couldn't reply from his account if he wanted to.

That's because the satoshi account in this forum is locked, don't you know that. I even more agree that satoshi remains anonymous, everyone comes by claiming that he is satoshi, they don't bring other good things. If it continues like that then anonymous is better, unless satoshi comes up with better technology development.