I think that when there is a person who has a criminal record, they should not pay so much attention to it, because it does not have much to do with online casinos, I think that all online casinos are interested in them playing on their platforms, putting in money and being able to do good management within them, I think that the other thing is the personal life of each one, and I do not think that a casino cares much about that. I know that the origin of funds is important but when it comes to FIAT money and those that most influence that's what banks are for, in crypto they skip all these things, giving the origin of funds in crypto, BTC, ETH or another I think would not make sense.
That is why some of the users always look for those casinos that provide privacy security and anonymity.
I have once done some research about the major reason why KYC was introduced in the casino and the answer is to protect the company from getting in trouble with the law since some people use them as a way to tint their stolen or illicit crypto so I believe casinos are not after users criminal but they are after keeping their record clean with the law.
If it is that way, it seems to me that it is something that is very good, in fact many people can use KYC as a way of not hiding what it is, however now it is that there are these types of demands in casinos, they seek to be as transparent as possible and despite the fact that it is something that people do not like, because most people do not like to give their data, it could be said that if the casino meets that requirement and that it has some seniority and if not it has negative reviews by the DT users of the forum it is something that is worth trusting, at least I see it that way, the KYC will always be an additional problem in crypto, because precisely the BTC was created so that people would not give their data or things like that, but in the case of casinos, the regulations and requirements are something else.
I agree with what you said. Bitcoin was created to be pseudonymous but I believe we already understand that change is always constant especially when it's an innovative setting if we don't want to lie to ourselves and I also believe we ought to foresee this happening in the cryptocurrency space if the ecosystem is getting more traffic or the institution is involved.
If that is a reality, of course, I know that there are many people who always seek to take care of their data and be the most anonymous so that no one knows anything about them, in fact on many occasions I have been in some threads where they talk about how would be the impact if Monero enters a casino? what would that acceptance be like and what would become of the other casinos seeing that they have an almost entirely anonymous currency, it is well known that Bitcoin is more universal and in all people what is heard most for the first time is Bitcoin, and then What is read or something is that altcoins and their functions are known, then this would be a great different option.
There are some casino that has already integrated Monero as a payment method before the compliance risk which led to the delisting of Monero on some tier 1 exchanges and the integration of Monero can still happen in some casinos. However, it's going to be 1 out of 10 casinos because of any form of anonymous deposit or withdrawal against casino Master license holder rules and regulations.
Yes, and I really like that integration in the event that it happens, because not everyone will do it, perhaps for fear that they might give them even more follow-up? I'm not very sure, but the SEC may be able to get in there, I think that the current KYC requirements that are so demanding, both for casinos and exchanges, is for that same action, to be able to do follow-ups, so they don't use Monero, because I've seen As an exchange as prestigious as Binance, they have surrendered to the is of many governments and authorities of some countries and have blocked many users of the exchange, including the blocking of some user funds that those governments considered suspicious, this is good for users. which are bad actually, but Monero makes the transactions more private, more anonymous, I think that would make it more difficult for the authorities to trace them. I think that may be a compelling reason today.
That's cool. Although I am a big fan of GGG, this contract is good news for crypto in general. Canelo is currently the biggest name in boxing and if only he wanted to fight thrice a year, he can easily become the world's highest-paid athlete just like his superstar predecessors Pacman and Mayweather.
This is a great move by Roobet as another crypto casino Stake also is becoming the major sponsor of world title fights in Japan, probably the main target is Japanese superstar and boxing's pound-for-pound Naoya Inoue.
The addition of Canelo as a brand ambassador is indeed a big step as he is one of the biggest name in boxing (together with Fury, Joshua, Uysk, ...). Seems that more and more casinos are starting to sponsor different sports such as UFC, boxing or soccer.
You are right my friend, let's see what a pleasant surprise Stake.com comes up with, most likely yes, Inoue is a great representation, however we have to wait, but I liked Roobet's movement with Canelo, honestly the Mexican He showed what he is made of, although I think that for now he will be resting because he wants to have that urgent operation done on his hand and I hope everything goes well for him, but he is a great figure as a representative of the casino, I think this is the corresponding path for being able to be at the top of boxing, now he is having more fans and this is a very good thing, the bets are increasing and I think that everything is going very well.
I think I disagree with you on this thing. Abusers will always try to abuse the system whether the casino is on hand stopping them to abuse the bonus and promotions. The casino had put lots of restrictions even banning or freezing the same IP accounts. They even clearly stated their rules on both TOS and promotional rules. It is that these abusers are getting smarter in creating a workaround to exploit the system and bypass rules. These abusers even extend their creativity to hiring people just to bypass KYC and other stuff. So basically the casino is trying their best not to get exploited but the method in combatting fraudsters and cheaters are limited.
Hackers and scammers are very innovative as well, they follow the trend and yes with that KYC, they tend to pay people in return of their personal identity which is also happening in my place. Theres a lot of victim with this already, and thats why we cannot blame the site to strengthen their security with KYC level 2, if Roobet implement this, Im pretty sure many will get mad again but sooner or later they will realize that its for their own benefit especially if its about security.
I would say you should never sell your documents because if someone is getting it from you his intentions are not good and most of the illicit crimes are done through this manner only.This is why I also fear KYC because your documents could be sold on dark web if you are sending them to non trusted third party users so beware of them and hackers use it to withdraw funds and bypass the restrictions easily.
You are right, as much as our documents are private, they are our identity, it is not worth leaving them there for some money, there are many who choose to use identities to commit many crimes, this is very common in the borders dangerous places in the world, where there are connections between two countries, like in South America, the most active border is where this type of thing is seen, where many crimes have been committed based on the relevant documentation that has been stolen, and on occasions when they realize, they have to report quickly because identity theft is the order of the day.
