Well said. The thought that your artwork is appreciated already means a lot hence the free spins are a good feature to motivate the contestants to never lose hope because there's still another chance, a next time to showcase their talent. Moreover I agree with so98nn, it's better than nothing because even you lose, you're not empty handed.

Nevertheless if you join in any contest always lower your expectation because even many people compliments you for a well done artwork, the decision is still on the judges and we know they have different taste on what artwork for them did stand out. Well, the winners are all great artists indeed.

The good streak must continue, and now it seems that Roobet has thought it through to implement a good new rule. Winning a counter is the dream of the participants, but of course they still have to compete with other participants. Actually Roobet has also provided more flexibility by creating several categories and that makes the chances of winning bigger in the categories that are mastered. Actually being able to take part in what is being held by Roobet is also something that makes the participants proud, it will make them even more excited when there are additional prizes for those who can't win.

That's right. People around me, in real life, often say "You gonna win this time! Your art is amazing!". But some of them don't even see the works by other contestants. Many people submit their entries in the very last day, and then it becomes clear that actually competition is tough. I take part almost in all Roobet art contests and when the thread is closed I always can spot couple of works that in my opinion have better chances than mine.

In every contest, every contender has the chance to win until the judges select the winners of the event. I believe what determining the winner of the contest is based on the judge's taste, culture, and background.
Having said that, the few qualities and elements which normally give the contestant the best chance of being the judge's favorite is the artwork's originality because good art is distinguished by its originality which is also the only way the artist expresses and communicates through her content.

Winners would be chosen by the internal team, the art contest manager and if seriously, by constructive idea from engaged marketing parties. Like Roobet team want to run art contests to get some art works for marketing, they order it to the art contest manager, but they plan to use chosen art works on some parties. I believe that the third parties can have their own criteria as well opinion on what art works should be chosen as winners and used on their websites.

It's my guess but frankly, it is internal criteria of Roobet team and engaged parties, we should not engage about that as well as art contest participants. Except if the team want to hear our opinion.

It is obvious that Roobet asking for KYC was a big problem when it first happened and it did continue to be a big problem for a while as well after it happened too. However, we need to realize that it is not going to change much and continue to be like this.

I understand that people like to see it change somehow and they want to make sure that we get to gamble in a way that we can stay anonymous if we want to have that and Roobet banned that. But that doesn't mean that they did something wrong, yes if you want to hide who you are then you won't gamble here but if we are talking about something that is a bit more towards the legit side then you will want to get your name out there and you want to share your KYC with them and then you are going to end up gambling at a place that is known as legit.

Many artists have their posts reserved and then submit art at last days but you have to be creative in your own way as each user has to present a different artwork.But the level of competition has gone up in all these years because of more people participating and existing members polishing up their skills even more but you should not loose hope as at some point maybe our art also got picked up by team and people who says you will win become right.

Well, we all know that AI is very fashionable now, and many believe that everything is done on the basis of AI, and that is not the case, there are still many errors in the AI, even more in the detectors, so it should not even be seen as a tool, That's like looking for information on Wikipedia, because it's something unreliable, not viable and even less to draw conclusions, for now things aren't that effective, I have no idea how the AI will be in 1 or 2 years maybe it is more perfected, and perhaps it has more validity, but now what we have seen is not good to be trusted,there are many errors, and they must be corrected.

I think that most likely AI will be developed to the level of a very smart person.  However, for this, programmers and many other specialists will have to work a lot.  
Now there are really many sources of information, as you noted, for example, Wikipedia, which contain unreliable or completely imaginary, sometimes even false information.  Obviously, on the basis of such information, false conclusions and even erroneous actions can be made.  For example, bets are made in a casino.  But it seems to me that experts working on AI come up with more and more sophisticated ways and algorithms for determining and eliminating and ignoring false information.  And this work must be successful.  
Therefore, I am an optimist in this matter.  But there is one thing!  Will it be safe and good for all mankind?  
This is exactly what is not clear.

As far as the ability of AI to evaluate the results of art competitions, I think that as of now, AI can only compare the submitted work with recognized masterpieces and other works of great artists.  And without the emotional component.  Therefore, the participation of AI in determining, for example, the results of the competition, I think, will still be incorrect and formal.  All the same, judges can easily do without tips or opinions from AI.

Current AI isnt just question and answer tool. It can influence on peoples decision and vision. Simple example - people ask AI to draw something. If a person does not know how it looks, then drawn by AI picture they will count as true. Abilities of arent limited, AI learn everyday from those questions and answers, it develops.

A lot of people want to try to use AI to win in gambling. I think that using AI to win is useless, because it can not predict random, and can not control luck. Also, it has no responsibility for the answer it gives.