6. Halving means btc is no longer profitable for many miners, difference this time, those miners can switch to BCH or BSV.
Two reasons, their lower hashrates means more profit from their already existing infrastructure.
Both have larger blocksizes, which means the miners can potentially earn more from transactions fees with BCH & BSV per block than BTC.
According to analysts , Miners have to increase transaction fees in BTC to a minimum of $21 per transaction to offset the loss of rewards,
due to it purposefully limited blocksize by bitcore devs.
Fees will be much less per transaction but more total fees possible in all altcoins including BCH, BSV,
due to their increased transactions capacity which the ASICS miners can also mine.
Your other points are pretty laughable but this one should get an award for the dumbest explanation of why BTC is not going to reach new highs
In short, for those who don't want to read the quoted part:
He thinks that halving will make mining unprofitable and miners will mine faketoshi's scamcoin instead, just because of lower hashrate and bigger blocks.
Blocks and difficulty means nothing if the coin is barely worth anything and you can't earn a lot from transaction fees if there are almost no transactions.
I can see all miners switching to a centralized shitcoin owned in 70% by Calvin when the value of newly mined Bitcoins doubles... You'd have to be a moron to do it.
