Do you have a source? I would like to see it for myself.

Maybe now that he's spent so much time in court, Faketoshi believes himself to be some sort of legal expert.  Next he'll provide "proof" he's a judge.   

Can someone not just have him sectioned already?  The man is clearly not well.

If this was really possible,the trust that users have over Bitcoin will disappear really fast,thus the Bitcoin price will go down to 1USD,therefore the court will confiscate something worthless,which doesn't make any sense.
Anyway,the hypothesis of faketoshi is technically impossible to happen.He is just FUDing against Bitcoin Core again.Noting usual.He does this every day,for about 3 years,AFAIK.Can't we just ignore him for a while?

Craig Wright is bluffing. No court has the right to decide on bitcoin as a whole in relation to the funds in its wallets. If the dispute concerns property rights, then the courts are not entitled to make decisions that violate the rights of an indefinite number of owners. Therefore, the statements of Craig Wright are baseless. The court may take certain measures if Wright proves that he is Satoshi Nakamoto. I think this will never happen.

Yeah, it's somehow in a Slack room and can anyone really verify if that's from Faketoshi itself? Well, even if it's from him this guy clearly doesn't show any truthfulness on what he says probably it's time to ignore him in hostility. He can't even get the BTC he said he had lost.

Calling it "bluffing" is far too generous.  A bluff is when you deceive someone into thinking you are going to do something.  So if people know that thing can't actually be done, as is the case here, it's not really a bluff.

Call it "bullshit", because that's all it is.

Craig Wright was saying that he knows about critical bug in Bitcoin that will destroy it, along with other outlandish claims like how Bitcoin will be dumped, but we all know that nothing like that happened, and it's pretty clear that nothing will happen this time - he's just spreading FUD. And I doubt any western court would issue such judgement, they aren't interesting in dealing with cryptocurrency as practice shows, and they would understand that it can't be realistically enforced because of Bitcoin's global nature.

Yeah, no.  Not at all.

But this is just speculation on his part, and the courts would have to exercise enormous power in order to get miners to do what he's proposing--more power than they probably have.  Plus I'm not sure if miners in China would think they're bound by a US court order (if I'm understanding this correctly).  Miners sure as hell wouldn't do it voluntarily.

Plus I don't think the legal system would in effect destroy bitcoin in order to settle a single case.  They'd be doing more harm than good, and I have to think that they'd see that.  Anyway, I think this is a bunch of BS anyway and yes it's FUD in the extreme.  CW is very wacky to say the least.

It's Faketoshi himself. They're calling it Metanet (https://metanet.icu/) and you even have to get a paid membership in order to listen to his delusional rambling. Sounds exactly like something Satoshi would dos.

The worst I have heard from someone who called himself crypto expert. We're decentralized and as such the whole world will be involve in this court order lol, how possible will this be with Craig wright? This is the worst decision he will take to end his Bullshits in the industry, we're not dump to know that; Bitcoin is bigger than any individual or a particular country were your court order will come from. Although, with other crabs created by him will be possible because,  they are his Bullshits property BSV and BCH.