Then, again, perhaps this man is never really Satoshi?

Or do we have to repeatedly debunk whatever foolishness this man says?

Actually, I don't even understand why cryptocurrency publications or writers are still dignifying whatever CSW says.

The more we look at clowns, the more they will make acts.

Let him do what he wants, let him say what he wants. We know what we are doing and we know what we believe in. Satoshi is out there and obviously, he is not the real one. Let him talk, he will be tired of barking in the long run.

Yup, who would believe this shit? even short-term BSV believers would doubt it at first glance. Just look at how stupid his argument is. If Satoshi didn't use Bitcointalk, then who's account is Satoshi Nakamoto here in the forum then? How come this Satoshi Nakamoto that we believed in are more fundamentally more knowledgeable than the self-proclaimed Faketoshi? it means that he doesn't know what he is talking about because he is not Satoshi Nakamoto himself.

There's just full of holes in his arguments, I wonder how he will get away with this one.


To be honest, it's pretty too late to ignore the guy at this point. He is kind of famous now and newbies will likely fall to his scheme if not given enough warnings. Giving him bad rep would surely save those newbies poor souls.

I so hate this slimeball. Especially when he uses the first-person while addressing Satoshi. Right from his writings in the beginning to the code, Satoshi came across as someone who always had the greater picture in mind. He is an idealistic genius who invented and thoughtfully nurtured bitcoin for the rest of the world.

This slimeball in a suit comes along and talks in the first-person when speaking about Satoshi, it makes my blood boil. Listening to any of the stuff he says on video is excruciating. For anyone who goes through the history of bitcoin available on this forum and elsewhere and for anyone with an iota of respect for the human coordination that went into making all of this a possibility, this worm of a man is an insult. Newbies buy into his scam influenced by the well-marketed sloganeering. Twitter is filled with trolls who fervently believe him, mostly newbie accounts. In August last year, Peter McCormack proposed filing a lawsuit against the slimeball but looks like it hasn't materialized yet. Isn't it time for such a step?

The scam propagated in the name of Satoshi Vision is stupid yet enticing for the millions of newbies still out in the woods when it comes to bitcoin. This identity theft should not go unpunished. CSW and his BullShitVision should be called out and dealt with because in the days of twitter, it is easy to generate a mass following by ensuring a core of bought/ misguided shills.

never used this forum? it clearly shows that he is really not Satoshi. i guess we need to stop giving him attention as he is always finding a new stunt so people will react on what he says....

the problem is that we can ignore the scammer but how about everyone else, more specifically the newcomers who may not be fully aware of the nature of his fraud? with all these desperate news sites that will always keep fishing for "hot" news to publish and get some traffic, his nonsense will always remain alive and could fool some people.
either everyone has to ignore him or his scams should be fought.

https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/5

Amazing how many people this guy could deceive and how much he won out of it.. What a shame.. We are satoshi

This makes me think that Craig Wright is an "attention whore".The guy is just desperate for attention.
If we ignore him,he will do something insane just to get our attention.This is pathological behavior.
The "sensationalist" crypto news websites will always publish his gibberish.He is the clown in the village.
According to Wikipedia,Satoshi created this forum back in 2009.
If Satoshi never used Bitcointalk,then who is the creator of Bitcointalk?

The news site, hoping to earn some hate clicks, publishes a provocative article. How fresh. Should we really pay attention to this?

Only madmen or conspiracy theorists believe Craig. And the journalists just laugh at him.