From the twittersphere ...

"Nope. Bitcoin was announced on the cryptography mailing list in January 2009 and many people could have tested it. I found Bitcoin around April. @Cointelegraph"



- https://twitter.com/marttimalmi/status/1263159959602298886

...

"Indeed. These folks call themselves journalists!

The BTC block in question was mined on Feb. 9th 2009.

In addition to SF, the 'cypherpunk' list and the P2P foundation - it's worth pointing out that http://bitcoin.org was also already live ...
- https://web.archive.org/web/20090131115053/http://bitcoin.org/"

- https://twitter.com/BitcoinFX_BTC/status/1263429814188421120

...

"0800-CALLCRAIG, Calvin, better check with #Faketoshi if it's not on his fake & debunked Tulip Trust list!"



- https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1263143402117398534

 

...

"So the drama around the 50BTC that moved from a early wallet gets even better....Craig submitted to court a while back this address belonged to him - And now Calvin says he spoke to Craig and he says it wasn't him ..."



- https://twitter.com/BitcoinMemeHub/status/1263388598453207042

 

...

- https://cointelegraph.com/news/craig-wright-denies-transferring-satoshi-coins-leaving-him-in-legal-catch-22/

I've looked through all the posts in the thread, and while it seems clear it's not Satoshi, it is one of the early adopters (or someone close to an early adopter who has access to coins) which is exciting to me. When going through transactions linked to the addresses, I've noticed something many people could miss due to language and political background. Namely, 17XiVVooLcdCUCMf9s4t4jTExacxwFS5uh sent 11-year-old BTC to 1BzN95J72BLBafwgZiZZvM9s7Wj2bxzA6m (40 BTC) and 3A6AsxxxzgHnGKhiFyW4tYX1Hn2sjNfrQP (almost 10 BTC). But this old address also received a few very small transactions about 17 hours ago from 1PutinHujnU54vbyr6DX1gF2esqxx7KEz (correct me if I got the transaction info wrong). Now, the part of the transaction I marked in bold hints to its owner being a Ukrainian (or a sympathizer) because it means 'Putin is a d*ck' (but in a more offensive way), and it's a Ukrainian political thing since 2014. Interestingly enough, this address was previously spotted in another case this year, sending some small amounts of money to Warren Buffett: https://cryptonews.com/news/what-have-vladimir-putin-warren-buffett-and-justin-sun-got-i-5877.htm. It's probably nothing, but in case someone wants to dig in, it could be a clue.

This is having zero effect on the market.

The ½ ing has dropped the diff.

I have spent more then five years studying difficulty drops more then anything else to predict price.

We are simply mirroring exactly what happen to litecoin last year after the lite coin 1/2ing


both difficulty and price dropped like mad.

LOOK AT LTC charts last year.

July 2019 pre 1/2ing 100 usd plus   difficulty 16.5 million
August 2019 after ½ ing 60 usd plus difficulty  11..4 million


we are simply doing a variation of that.

Oh ok. I make the previous statement cause i once hear that the bitcoins in Satoshi wallet may somehow affect price of bitcoin market but due to your respond i think the exit of some miners after bitcoin halving which will lead to difficulty reduction was the reason why some people believe the halving effect to have already priced in but if we judge base on the difficulty decrease that happen 2013 and 2018

We are now getting an unexpected market movement of the coins from the highest market price that is over reaching out over into 9.9k dollars now it is already low for over 8.8k which is unexpected market movement of the coins and if you are getting curious there are a large amount of the market investment already pulled out within a single day which makes a lot of conclusion and rumors about the market that Satoshi Nakamoto investment already fall back its money from the year of 2009.
There are a lot of transactions noticed because of this kind of movement and we can observe this.

There are a lot of humor that the creator of the bitcoin will now show off it's personally again because of these a lot of address created and now most of the wallets are already have 0 balances.

For my one I am just gonna sit back and relax. 

I will no longer expect a serious loss here anyway.
It's all too big for that, and as I said before, why would Satoshi destroy his masterpiece?

I just can't imagine that after all these years of success!

It's just a mere transfer of coins, I don't think that's related to any sort of destruction

Read the whole post. No one knows if it is actually Satoshis coin or someone elses. If some says those coins for sure belongs to Satoshi, then that guy is just trying to spread FUDs. Might me one of those early miners, or maybe Satoshi himself, who knows..

I highly doubt Satoshi would even touch his stash. If he starts moving his coins, people would start panicking.

Yup, it won't destroy the market but I can see lots of bloodshed happening because, Satoshi

They stated that it could be Satoshi's Wallet but it could also be one of the early adopter of Bitcoin who mostly forget about it for a very long time.
But it could also be Satoshi moving some small Bitcoin due to financial crisis, I think if this is the real Satoshi it would take some time again before we see some old wallet moves another Bitcoin because it is just for a personal use and he/she doesn't really want to affect the price or make some price movement  FUD/FOMO.