Can you do one with the sum like you did with the difference. In other words, is the conflict eroding their collective strength? It does seem so.

Excellent data!

I wouldn't call it an "argument" as there is nothing to argue about.  I guess it's stupid to keep pointing out he's scammed millions until I can provide the proof in a way everyone can understand.

This chart does prove the attitude here is changing as many of us predicted.  The mass exodus of veteran members will probably continue unless the admin takes steps to control the trolling and corruption.   I regret never recording the history of the active membership numbers on BPIP, but I predict the number will drop to five figures within the next month.

You can quite easily get the DT2 strength by counting DT1 inclusions minus exclusions for those weeks.

Yes this is probably the lesson to be learnt from the past 15 months. If you're going to accuse someone of being a scammer, then create a proper thread in scam accusations, with the correct format and relevant evidence for users to act upon. Slandering people from the sidelines (even if true) will get you nowhere it seems, only losing DT1 support, statistically speaking.


Indeed, although as the graph sub-title suggests, I calculated the DT1 strength (as opposed to DT2 strength) for these graphs for either user not being in DT1.
Ie, the DT1 strength calculated is irrelevant of whether the users were elected into DT1 at the time or not, in order to keep the numbers more consistent.


I'm not convinced this is the case, it's probably more likely to do with the following:

Indeed, that's why I said:


"give the impression of being something or having a particular quality."

Often there are good reasons not to take people's words out of context 

Fortunately the statistics weren't for you, they were partly due to the request from Vod, personal interest and otherwise for the benefit of those who merited it  


I don't know why you're still in this thread  

I don't care about your merit queue, you're welcome to move along now You see, not everyone cares about receiving merit 


Oh the irony  

I don't need a self-moderated thread, only self-discipline. That of not pandering to your needs 

My bad. That comment was intended for V8s, not yourself. Your quote was intended as an example of who the data was intended for. Apologies for lack of clarity, I realize how it looked liked I was replying to you. That wasn't the intent. Carry on with your opinions, I think they have value, regardless of whether I agree with them or not.

---

Does now make me wonder why someone would consider meriting graphs they consider irrelevant and useless, as it doesn't seem like a good use of merit at all



Does anyone else think this is slightly odd, especially from someone applying to be a merit source? Just curious.