1) You're evading a ban.
2) I'm not an employee of Bitcointalk.
3) JollyGood is not my hitman. I don't suppose you got any proof of that or anything else in your post?

Counter Questions:

1) Aren't you guys, as arguably the most active members of Bitcointalk, the least bit concerned that provably bad actors and totally unethical abusers like jollygood and lauda are now part of your beloved Default Trust network ?

2) Why do you always play blind, deaf and mute, when hitmen emerge to defame independent and talented members in this forum, is it to protect your Chipmixer and avatar Salaries and various other benefits ?

3) Don't you realize this corrupt and nepotistic behavior has turned this forum into a ghost town, with only a handful people other than the Chipmixer cult remaining...
Please don't derail this thread with bullshit, it will be promptly deleted, and directly address the questions raised to you.

Thanks

Those aren't really questions, just some fallacies with question marks at the end. I have to note that I exclude both JollyGood and Lauda but that has nothing to do with avatars or Chipmixer or whatever, nor should it. So you're gonna have to find something else to blame me for.


Aha! LoyceV's fault obviously.

From that topic:
Have you tried that gumusi?

Ok, so it's expectable for DT1's to slap agendic and illogical feedbacks on users trust wall and demand for an PM to remove it or get it changed to neutral or beg to the DT (who you feel is racist) for reconsideng the feedback. This should go in some DT guide, I guess.

OP, is not obligate to send PM, I already had bad experiences with many DTs in PM on such feedback cases, it's doesn't turn right.

Calm down hacker, there were no demands or begging suggested. I do see your point though, if you feel someone is being racist, they aren't approachable by default (whether they are racist or not is completely irrelevant). To me it seems like a clear cut case of revising feedback based on being given a push to do so, more or less following suggestions from those you consider more powerful than yourself, as opposed to any form of self-reflection. It comes across as self-preservation more than anything else. Disappointing to the say the least  


This.

Excellent thread by @gumusi.

Here he is employing a technique known to ardent students of logic as "Modus Tollendo Ponens" or disjunctive syllogism, which I noted with some surprise that even many of the local users he is defending seem to have missed  ...

It goes like this, 1 of the following statements must be true:

Either i) the Default Trust System is working as intended and bad actors and abusers are eliminated by the collective conscience of DT1 and BTT community
or ii) the DT system is in ruins, and therefore this forum in its current format is considerably broken.

He then goes on to say, since the DT1 and the larger BTT community are mostly silent on the ongoing libel and black propaganda by crooked ninjas like ~jollygood and ~lauda that they end up getting represented on the DT system month after month,

the inevitable conclusion must be that the Default Trust system is a joke and serves mainly to smear strong and independent opponents for political reasons and has subtracted greatly from the prestige and brand value of Bitcointalk.

Instead of wasting time on extremely minor details and personal scuffles, please try to address the arguments from the overarching theme mentioned in the OP.

All the Best

At this point it would be fair to conclude that Bitcointalk should be boycotted and avoided as a broken forum until such time that all the Negative Trust spammers are blacklisted from ALL layers of DT.

It's not rocket science guys, if someone is spamming nonsensical ratings simply to vent their toxic hatred like trolls jollygood and lauda here, you need a mechanism in place so that they don't prevent healthy traffic and engagement, if you have any desire to maintain a functional forum...

Stop shitposting, Vispilio...

I have read my post few times and I am sure I said "stop shitposting, Vispilio".

You agreed to something which is not true (read posts #2 and #3), you said it is excellent thread and then you made your regular political shitpost. You don't even want to read anything and look into facts.