I don't think admins or the recovery team will consider signed Ethereum addresses when proving ownership and recovering accounts. They could, but in that case people will start asking to sign messages from other altcoins as well.

According to theymos:
One might ask, what those rare situations are. But it doesn't cost anything to sign a message with a Bitcoin address so there is no sense in experimenting with alternatives. 
 

The best should be a mix of:
 Email was used to register account.
A Bitcoin signed message that was quoted or staked before.
And maybe more things, secret questions, IP addresses, some more things that admins, Cryptios team can ask you to prove account ownership.

This post from Welsh is very good for your forum account's sensitive data in PMs. I think everyone should spend time to read Welsh's post and check PMs and delete PMs that have sensitive information.

If your account unfortunately is compromised, you will not lose your sensitive data in PMs if you delete them. PMs will be only deleted all if sender and all receivers delete them all. It is difficult to ask receivers delete PMs in their conversations with you but you must do it from your side.

The Brave browser also has "Tor mode", you can add it to the description if you like.

Good point, but IMO it's still better than Chrome when you need to visit website that only works properly with Google Chrome, if you disable ALL annoying feature (BAT reward, exchange widget, etc.).
But i would use another browser based on Chromium such as https://github.com/Eloston/ungoogled-chromium.


If you plan to use Tor, you better use Tor Browser.

I agree with you about the Brave browser.
But also, for those who can and want to figure out all the privacy settings on their own, I would like to offer this guide for configuring the Firefox browser.
I have been looking for an up-to-date guide for a long time, with a more detailed description of all the actions that are proposed to be performed for the browser to become the most secure safe browser. And in my opinion, this is one of the complete and detailed tutorials.

https://12bytes.org/articles/tech/firefox/firefoxgecko-configuration-guide-for-privacy-and-performance-buffs/

You can recover your account if you stake a bitcoin address or your bitcoin address was posted and quoted and you can sign a message from it after the hack of your account.

You will receive email notification from the forum if your posts are deleted as spam, zero value, off topic but you won't receive notification if the thread in which you post is moved by moderators to trashcan.

Your email will be flooded with notifications (3 to 4 thousands of notifications each day: https://btctalk.live/today/) and I don't think you need them. You can edit your Watch List, Watch board with https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=watchlist

Also worth noting, the majority of the time security breaches are because of the person behind the screen, and not the software. Since, usually its easier for a attacker to target someone who has weaknesses, and only one mind, than to attack software which has been out for years, tested by thousands, and being actively developed. I'm not saying that software isn't targeted because it most certainly is. This is especially true, when it comes to privacy. There's a lot of software which is specifically designed to keep your privacy in tact, but its usually the end user which compromises it by misusing the software, or simply by making a mistake.

So, although its always best to take security seriously, and follow the advice of the experts, you should be taking precautions against your mistakes that can creep in through complacency, which is something privacy, anti virus software, and security measures can induce by giving an illusion of safety.  

Finding the balance between security, and user experience is difficult. Depending on your user base, some might require strict security practices, where others may find convenient ways of retrieving their accounts beneficial if they so happen to lose the account. Without being too stereotypical, this is quite common in the older generations, where they become forgetful of their credentials, or simply don't want to go through all the security protocols to retrieve their data. As far as I'm concerned a security question is a flawed design, because of the way its presented. A lot of websites do it far worse, and make you choose between a predefined question, which means its usually asking a personalized question such as "what was your first pets name", now you could do a random answer length should be treated just as important as a password though), but usually people find this convenient to remember, and put in their actual data, which is usually easily found out with social engineering. Especially, of the age of social media where pretty much everyone documents their life, sometimes without even realizing the data they're presenting to the world.

No sensitive information should be displayed or be obtainable by anyone visiting your profile link. Skype or emails connected to your real name. Even a website link that leads to your personal website where you might have posted about yourself, where you live, work, or a photograph of yourself, your house, etc. Links to social media can obviously also be abused if someone targets you.