Lol get out of my thread.

Who the hell are you?

Looks like you intentionally created this Use Your Brain account (and other accounts) to post a thread, discredit and attack the several complaints made against Sportsbet.io.

Are you getting paid by Sportsbet.io to do all this bs? Little man, you are disgusting.


I am not even Russian.


Saying that "we rushed to do many bets in a short time frame",.. have you ever bet on live events? You sound ridiculous and your accusations are just pathetic.

Insulting our English as well.. At least I can communicate very well while knowing and speaking more than 1 language. I am pretty sure you are limited to only English, you ignorant.

Use your brain and get out of here.

Yeah, there are more and more players having issues with them, so eventually they will have to face it and its going to be negative for them (KARMA).

Go lick their ass, whoever you are you just show how pathetic Sportsbet.io can be as to make low lives like you attack whoever has a complaint against them.

Will just ignore you, you arent worth my time.

Keep "smile-ing" and get lost

Are we surprised? No! Because Sportbet.io is really very scam project.

You are right that I am a beginner. but I never claimed that I knew everything.

You are very wrong on that nutildah.

The player takes a risk in placing the bet. From the moment the bet is won the money is his. So if he gets anything less returned than his deposits + his winnings it is indeed a loss.

It's like if you go to work for 10 days and then you don't get paid, because fuck you. Would you also say that's not a scam because technically you just worked and didn't lose any money? Your reasoning makes exactly 0 sense.

Exactly, when the bet is made an agreement is closed btw the booker and the player, which implies that if the bet is lost, the booker takes the money, but if it isnt, the player recovers the money he previously put on risk + profits.

Not if he was never eligible to receive it in the first place. In that case the net winnings are zero. I already said it would be more ideal if the system flushed out multi-accounters before they placed their bets, but nobody does that.


This is an overly-simplified analogy that leaves out relevant details of both real and hypothetical situations.

We're just beating a dead horse here. There's nothing more to be said. What it comes down to is either taking the side of Sportsbet or the side of OP in choosing who you want to believe. Maybe Sportsbet will provide more input into the matter but I wouldn't hold my breath.

Until then I'm going to excuse myself from this conversation because its now quite boring but feel free to continue on if you must.

Yeah but that's the issue. Because the implied contract starts when the player places the bet. Basically the casino has until the start of the game the bet is placed on to null the bet. After that it's set in stone.

Your point is relevant, but it's exactly what is wrong. Casinos decide wether the bet is ok or not based on the outcome of the bet. The input is already flawed.

I stand by my point.

Let everything aside, would you play in a casino if you knew your winnings could be confiscated for whatever bullshit reason? I wouldn't.

Don't give me that it is written in their ToS. Nobody reads it. They should, but they don't. Accept this reality first. You don't read it neither.

According to my logic, no ToS should be above common sense. THAT shit makes no sense. None. Zip.

I never heard of a casino returning the initial deposits of a losing player btw. Never.