Correct, there is no rule that a certain number can be in gambling discussion. The rule is only 1 post in that section will count. I'm sorry you didn't read that rule, it was pretty clear. That means if you did 8 posts in gambling discussion then 7 will not count.

I think you need to reread the rules bud. It clearly states only 1 post per week will count in gambling discussion. 100% clear.

actually Yahoo mentioned about this issue twice in other pages



I have clearly understand what Yahoo means in those posts though i am not part of the campaign . hope you'll find it right as well. since there might be another week coming for this campaign.

Goodluck guys and hope this issue will be settle soon.

Isn't it what you have said is just the same as the rule itself? You have stated that there should be 1 out of 25 post can be in the gambling discussion, which is the same as exactly what yahoo said that only 1 post will be counted from the gambling discussion board.

I think the rule is not clear for you, maybe next time, you should ask for clarifications before doing the job.

I am one of the participants who did not qualify for this week.

Honestly, my understanding on the rules is the same with Haunebu, as in the past campaigns I have participated, it's usually at least 5 posts in gambling section (could be coming from gambling board and/or gambling discussion board) so at least means the minimum, and if I make 10 posts on that section, that would make me qualify for the gambling section posts requirement which is at least 5 and all my 10 posts will be credited towards the minimum of 25 posts requirement in a week.


The specific rule below is quite confusing to me, as in my understanding using my common sense, if it's only 1 is counted in gambling discussion board, then only 4 should also be counted in gambling board, and I saw there are posters who made over 4 posts in this board, yet all posts are considered qualified. 





I wish I was able to read this post, it might help me understand more what the rules really says.


Lastly, I respect the manager's decision as I have worked with him many times in the past, and hopefully everything will be smooth for all the participants if this campaign will still run next week.   Have a good day!

Confirming I got my payment.
Problem is that people are not reading the rules, so no point complaining to manager and his rules.
If you don't like the rules , you can look for other campaign.
However I do think posts in gambling discussion could be increased from 1 to maybe 2 or 3.
Just my opinion

You don't get my point, I was thinking that at least 5 is the minimum posts required that should be coming from gambling board (4) and gambling discussion board (1),  but you can make 25 posts combine from that section and you'll qualify to both 5 minimum and 25 minimum total posts a week.

Now, if we look at the opposite side which is the maximum, it should be maximum of 1 gambling discussion board and 4 gambling board, and if I make 25 posts  combine from that section, my total posts credited would only be 5 which I will pass on the minimum 5 but will not meet the total posts requirement for the week. So this is the example I cited since there are members who made over 4 posts in gambling board but the excess of 4 is still counted towards the 25 posts requirement, which I think it should not be based on the rules.

Jut to clarify, I am not complaining here, I am just expressing my honest understanding on the rules which confused some of the participants, and like I said in my previous post, I respect the manager's decision.

The entire confusion is in the rules itself period. I have worked on many casino signature campaigns over time and never faced this sort of issue because the rules were crystal clear and easy to follow.

The manager should have explicitly mentioned that only 1 out of 25 posts in the gambling discussion section would count instead. Instead, he made it clear later on by replying to your post which many including me didn't read.

The manager and the rules are at fault here and I don't really care whether others agree with me or not.

I qualified for the payment this week. Though, honestly, the rule was a little ambiguous for me. I didn't risk posting on gambling discussion just to be on the safe side.

Since it was not mentioned that posts on the Gambling discussion will not count, the phrase only 1 post per week will count in gambling discussion made a lot of people assume this only applies for the required 5 posts on the campaign not on the 25 posts requirement as a whole.

Just saw the spreadsheet and imo yahoo is bit generous. There are some participants who actually didn't deserve the payment which they were less of 1-2 qualified post but he decided to appreciate their effort by paying half. And yeah, keeping an eye on your campaign thread is a must, and the rule is written there. I was bit confused too at the first day of enrollment but when deisik asked to make sure about that rule yahoo has answered it clearly. But I still appreciate that you are stating your opinion using your own account. I think it could be a lesson for everyone.