Even though that was just still a plan and for under further discussion and might change up accordingly depending upon the presentation of data if they will re-ban Bitcoin or not, still it looks so tiring for people in India seeing banning, lifting and re-banning once again and for sure that the people are getting sick of it getting confuse on where they would be situated. Before doing such big decisions, the government has to review first all the concerns of the people with regards to that and widen the concept of understanding regarding the issue. The government must conduct and deep and thorough research about the matter and make them understand every concept why Bitcoin must not be put into the stake of re-banning once again. They must see both side of the situation before doing big decision that would supposedly be finalized so that it won't be a hassle and turning point of confusion on what is the real stand of India with regards to the issue of Bitcoin.

They have more than 1.3 billion people and this is a country with a young workforce participating in the world's leading technology jobs. Cryptocurrency is suitable for them because it is convenient and knowledgeable.
India can ban but not completely control everyone. Nigerians have succeeded in their war for their state to accept Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies if in the future Indians are determined to use cryptocurrencies, then maybe their government will do like Nigeria.

Their is a funny comment on the news that the last court injunction that allow bitcoin in India enabled 480% price increase in bitcoin. Thats incredible! I hate this back and forth in regulation, if they want regulations that allow this trade, the country should enact it. In the few months of trade they already have enough to lose, something around $3 billion only in India. ATM I dont think other asian countries rely on India to make any decision on cryptocurrency, they already did.

Think the best option would be for governments (such as the Indian government) to introduce their own decentralised coin on the blockchain platform

Agreed, with the effort of government it is possible to secure the citizens from the scams in the name of cryptocurrency. Whenever there arises controversy related to cryptocurrency, automatically government come up with the statement that cryptocurrencies are full of scams and illegal trades.

When it comes to my country India, the government isn't strong enough to take good decision on digital growth. But, in each and every manifesto the government states it'll give importance to digital growth.

Once again, this rumor has been proved false

Every now and then, some of the Bitcoin whales spread this news, in order to crash the Bitcoin exchange rates. However, this time it didn't had any noticeable impact on the prices.

Here is the confirmation:

https://cointelegraph.com/news/fresh-reports-of-indian-crypto-ban-are-clickbait-says-local-source


Let me confirm this once again: No such bill is scheduled for discussion in the Indian parliament.

The supreme court didn't declared that Bitcoin was legal. They declared that the banking ban on Bitcoin was illegal. Some of the analysts claim that this mean that Bitcoin is legal in India. As such, there was no ban imposed on Bitcoin. However, there was a ban on the use of bank accounts, for the purpose of cryptocurrency trading. This ban was overturned by the supreme court of India. 

It is a fine line when it comes to the interpretation of the law,  the mobile association approached the Supreme court challenging the ban imposed against institutions by the RBI and the legality of BTCitcoin and the important note i saw in the judgement is that the court reviewed and said that cryptocurrency is capable of being accepted as a valid payment for the purchase of goods and payment services and the RBI should think about regulating it.

The above highlighted is the almost exact quote from the judgement notes which means it is legal in the eyes of the Supreme court. If the government or the RBI come up with a counter point and convince otherwise we might see a different judgement, but as of now this is the situation.

In this case, the Supreme Court has taken a favorable view of the cryptocurrency. But still, the judgement can change as per the government policy. If the government comes up with a law banning the ownership and transaction of cryptocurrency, I don't think that the courts can remove that ban (at the most, they can give suggestions). Last time, the loophole was created because the government was not yet ready with a law regarding cryptocurrency.

Re-ban? Does that mean the bitcoin was once banned already in India? well it's a sad news for me to know that India would be one of the country which cryptocurrency or Bitcoin is banned that means more users will not be able to use the cryptocurrency but it seems you said it would take 2-3 years maybe battle on supreme court I hope in you'll win this battle.