Bitcoin is a plus point for them and also the reason to resist is that the government is currently improving the country’s economy through the use of blockchain technology has made digital transactions easier to use. So even though the government doesn't legalize bitcoin it thinks it's too big.

From a technical point of view, it's okay to explicitly ban bitcoin transactions in a country. Bitcoin transactions do not depend on a centralized state, but on all the nodes of the Internet. The state can be regarded as the central authority and can stop its own transactions, but cannot stop other nodes from continuing to operate. From the perspective of interests: according to the attack of 51% computing power, it can hinder the correctness of the receiving data of other nodes. However, the cost of use is too large. I have asked the people in the mine, and based on the current block size, it would cost billions or even billions of dollars to tamper with the data. The cost and purpose are not proportional. And digital currency cannot be banned.

Most countries in the world are scrambling to regulate Bitcoin. Some countries, such as Bolivia, Egypt and Saudi Arabia, even try to ban it completely. The problem is, no matter what the regulators say, Bitcoin cannot be banned.
Because it is actually impossible to write laws to oppose an agreement that is far superior to human subjective legal systems. The government may "ban Bitcoin", but their people will continue to use it.
The Internet may be partially censored. Websites can be banned, and governments of dictatorships can even prohibit everyone from accessing the Internet. This is because the Internet still relies on ISP vendors and centralized servers that the government can control. Bitcoin is not banned. Because it relies on node decentralization, its distributed software has developed to the point where it cannot be shut down globally.

Do you think it is easy for them to kill it?
Nah BTC is much more stronger technically. Have Governmens able to end everything they believe danger to them?
No. They can never kill BTC even if they want to.

Recently, China has completely blocked Bitcoin. But banning Bitcoin in a country will not kill Bitcoin, because Bitcoin has countless nodes in the entire network, and it will never be completely banned unless all governments in the world completely block Bitcoin, but we all know that this is not may.

Government can't control a decentralized community; they might manipulate us by spreading FUD to lose our trust and interest, but Bitcoin is like the blueprint in blockchain processes. So more projects based on cryptocurrencies will emerge, and BTC will stay the prime.

Why government cannot stop bitcoin?.. simply because they cannot do so, also because they seeing the advantage of it although for some it seem like a rivalry to the bank. Bitcoin is one separate system that they cannot control actually and so all they can do is either adapt or banned it, for some country they did it but for other they saw great potential in it and can help them raise the standard of their economy.

In fact in places where bitcoin is outright banned, prices rise significantly higher than elsewhere.

most governments are not governments like china or russia or many other dictatorship governments, no press freedoms or no freedoms for their people, so governments where there is good freedom and democracy and laws they just prefer to watch and see what impact will bitcoin have before they take steps like banning, because they can take advantage of that benefit of bitcoin, while intolerant governments rush to ban bitcoin or do things to restrict bitcoin usage