I think you got what moamin77 tried to say wrongly. What he said, if I may asume, was simply that team has planned their roadmap carefully, the decision to release their first product, VPN, alongside with uniswap listing is an implementation of their strategic planning, namely opening an access point of liquidity side-by-side with working product that creates demand. Thus the sentence "listing without proper demand = nothing".

JACS team always put their focus on their community growth, as evidenced by how they kept going despite the demand to get listed on exchanges since months ago, or the simplest way like keeping their telegram channel strictly professional by not allowing stickers and mundane discussion --which, actually creates an easier to follow channel because updates and discussion were not drowned by other matter... or stupid stickers.

With the way yo Telegram Mod response to chat and these your comments, I had to view your profile again and it's a pity that some users invested in Jac.
Why would you say hunters are hungry to dump their tokens? They work for you and they get paid, they need to sell for their fiat value and that has been the traditional thing of bounties. If you had done marketing and promotion from agency, you wouldn't have said the above.
Do well and work on your products, either you like it or not, those who will sell, will sell their bags regardless of how strong or bad your project is.

Jac is this and that, yet you listed on a ghost exchange, who still use Folkdelta in 2021 when there is Uniswap

You said this because... on December 6th you misunderstood and got confused about an older chat, and team explained in a direct and blunt answer instead of sugarcoating their explanation?

And about forkdelta... you're completely aware that literally few pages back were talking about uniswap listing, right? The one that'll happen in matter of days?

Who's gonna invest money? No one, as we've already secured private investment months ago
The demand will come from the product
Stay tuned and be optimistic

then what if the jacs product does not sell in the market that means the jacs value price is also not valuable right? if so why do you hold ico? if we have private investors? 

We answered this question many times, to reiterate; with the ICO held late 2020; we wanted to squeeze our roadmap/timeline by getting public funds but when the ICO went on the low side, we highlighted that we will move according to the normal track of operation (no moon shot or mars shot)

Where did you get this info? as I remember JACS project is not even 1 year old?
about the milestone: if I'm not mistaken, the current milestone from JACS is the app which currently Pre-Alpha/Alpha phase

this is absolutely a good thing.
I do not mean to compare with any project, but most projects when their token sale is not fulfilled they leave the project or postponed what has been planned in the roadmap.

But JACS is a different story, with a token sale (sorry to say but the token sale is not good enough). JACS still follows what has been planned in the roadmap

Who are private investors, we don't know and how they are developing the product we don't know and even they are not providing any update about the product development? Even the community is very positive about the roadmap but no progress and developments from the team.

What kind of information you need to know about the private investors? Their names, bios and shares? Sorry but No.
The first product, that is the JACS VPN Mobile APP was available for testing over the markets (Android and Apple) for more than a couple of months now and many users have successfully tested and enjoyed it for free
The final version is coming within days as we highlighted many times, we have some issues with the Apple final version that we are trying to overcome