I think, DarkStar_ is paid for this job. Also, if he need assist, I see no reason he should not open such a topic.
An opening new discussion is unnecessary, especially if we know that the selection process still not started. We’re just creating even more drama around one signature campaign.

LOL this looks like a good place to post this:


I was so proud of it and someone reported it... not cool.

DarkStar_ is paid for managing the campaign, not for tolerating the drama going on that thread and it's all the time. If I were the CM, may be I would make the thread self moderated and wouldn't allow single post other than application and some other post which makes sense. But the posts (drama actually) we see all the times when ChipMixer have an open slot, isn't necessary at all, not at least for that thread.
It's good that OP has created this thread and would be pretty good if all the off topic shits for that thread go here.

Ima report you for doxing.


Self mod is probably a bad idea. Off topic posts can be reported to mods (like my doorbusting gif above) but discussing the campaign itself inside the thread should be ok. Where else would you suggest to do it? Having multiple threads for the same "service" is technically against the rules too.

It’s ok OP..
We can have 2 threads

I don't understand what all the fuss is about? People are complaining in a signature campaign thread? Chipmixer has open slots? Darkstar is too incompetent to make a decision on whom to add?

Come on guys, it's a freaking signature campaign. Darkstar will make his decision and move on. There are plenty of open spots in other campaigns. Not sure why anyone thought this thread was needed at all, nor why anyone would think Darkstar cannot handle the task of adding a few members to a campaign.

I can certainly see the reasoning behind that suggestion, but I'd prefer to see campaign threads not be self-moderated.  What would be better is if the campaign manager made some local rules so that if/when members started breaking them, he'd have good ground to stand on if he reported the offending post(s).

I haven't visited the Chipmixer campaign thread lately, but based on what I've read so far in this one there's some drama a-brewing over some applications?  I'm not asking anyone to answer that, as I'll probably un-ignore the Services section and take a look at DarkStar_'s thread and see for myself.

If that's one of the arguments being bandied about, I'd have to strenuously disagree with it.  If he ever did a piss-poor job of selecting participants, it sure isn't reflected in the current roster.  I'd also point out that DarkStar_ is extremely selective when choosing from a pool of applicants.  I got rejected once, and I've heard other members have been rejected multiple times before getting in.  TL;DR: he's fuckin' good.

I think there are some tools that may help his selection

For example
Loycev Has this service

https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/5273876.0

I also made this tool , merit table where he can see where each applicant earnes or spent their merits
https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/5265298.0

Chipmixer open signature campaign in bitcointalk forum is the same like United States presidential debate before elections.  

I am sure DarkStar_ and other members know how to report offtopic and rant posts for moderators to delete.