That defeats the whole point of having atomic swaps. We need the JoinMarket equivalent of Atomic Swaps. In other words, we need a open source version which is free of any centralized platform and worked on by independent developers.
There are a lot of issues preventing the existence of one that would have success. For one, JoinMarket requires only BTC which is easier to work with than cross-chain. You have to find people who want to change BTC for another coin at the same rate at the same time - and it's usually greedy people with exaggerated rates who are joining those markets.
Then, the setup itself is a quite big headache for the average user. We need something that is user-friendly and Komodo's is the closest one, although the KYC thing was a very big disappointment for me.
I'm quite surprised there is no fully working product for Monero and Bitcoin, honestly. It seems to me like that would be a huge hit.
that's the catch-22. all current implementations require a centralized infrastructure, even if they are made to be non-custodial.
in practice, that means any platform that's large enough to get the attention of regulators will be forced to implement AML/KYC. sure, anyone can fork the repo and swap without KYC, but that obviously removes all the original platform's liquidity.
I don't think all of the current implementations require centralized infrastructures. If I'm not wrong, Blocknet currently does not have any centralized infrastructure but I've never used it to know whether there's liquidity over there or not (although I do not think so). AFAIK, it's p2p.
BEAM's atomic swap doesn't seem to have a centralized infrastructure either, but I may be very well wrong of course.
