The Bitcoin community is definitely worse today than it was 10 years ago, so many people that were against crypto back then are now using crypto to scam.
Your assessment is very wrong in my opinion, because those who have been against crypto ten years ago does not mean they don't like crypto. But some of those who oppose it are those who still don't understand what crypto is, so they immediately make the decision to oppose it, even after they learn more about it. I'm sure some people who have been against crypto in the past are using crypto now and it really is regardless of what they use it for, because I don't think those who have been against crypto in the past would be using crypto to fool more people in the future This.
That's a pretty sadistic assessment in my opinion because not everyone nowadays uses crypto to deceive more people and if you've ever been scammed by someone else through crypto, I think you're just wrong in trusting people. It's not that the crypto isn't good and you also can't say the Bitcoin community is much worse for now, because Bitcoin is always growing better until now.
Holy shit! Why use the word crypto so much? Are you talking about bitcoin or not?
I think that the word crypto should be avoided, unless you specify what you mean by it.. and surely there were not very many coins around 10 years ago, so most likely when we are talking about "people being against crypto 10 years ago," then it seems that we would be talking about bitcoin...
I know that there were some other coins 10 years ago, but let's try to make it clear what we are talking about.. bitcoin or something else or something related to bitcoin.. This thread happens to be about bitcoin, and it is in the bitcoin discussion section too.. so if there is reference to "crypto", but really the intent to talk about bitcoin, then why not just use the word bitcoin.. If you are referring to something other than bitcoin, then specify what you mean, because vague references to "crypto" can cause a lot of confusion regarding what you are talking about.
Anyways, don't compare old times to now, those who are buying bitcoin right now can only become richer, cus they are already rich, think about it, it takes a rich man to afford 1 whole bitcoin at the moment, and owning 1 whole bitcoin or even more bitcoins is how the rich can become richer, for those who are poor and wanna make millions of dollars holding 0.01 bitcoin, sorry, but might have to wait a very very long time, if at all its possible to make a million dollar through holding 0.01 bitcoin.
I agree with most of what you had said in the post linked above, except some of your phraseology in this above cited section has some strange and/or discordant implications.
Maybe I am mostly bothered by your suggestion that there is a need to already be rich in order to become rich from bitcoin, and even though surely there are no guarantees in bitcoin, it seems to be far from true that any of us need to already be rich (or even new coiners or no coiners need to already be rich) in order to become rich from bitcoin.
Bitcoin seems to be amongst the best (if not the best) of investments (and asymmetric bets to the upside) that is available to almost anyone who is willing to put some efforts into acquiring some of it and securing it.
Whether we seek to go from non-millionaire status and into millionaire status may well be an additional question that is a matter of degree, but still should not necessarily motivate normies to feel as if they have to think in terms of having to become a millionaire when the fact of the matter is likely that bitcoin has decently good chances of improving the financial/psychological well-being of a lot of normies, no matter their investment level, so long as they figure out ways to tailor their BTC investment (accumulation/maintenance) in such a way that is suitable to their own circumstances while hopefully continuing to attempt to learn along the journey of accumulating BTC and maintaining a BTC stash.