Project laws are often weird, controversial and risky, but they usually don't become laws. As for tightening the regulations of stable coins, I'd actually say it's a good idea. Stablecoins should prove they're backed up, and they should be strictly supervised because people rely so much on them remaining stable. Bitcoin, on the other hand, is not stable, and people are aware of that, so there's no risk of the same kind involved as with USDT.
Well, I also agree that stable coins regulation should be strictly implemented. The said "backed" fund must tally to the circulating supply, and these planned policy is a good thing since once approved, stable coins will be thoroughly audited and checked if the claimed back fund can support the whole token. This will somehow protect Stable coin holder from possible losses due to lack of fundings.
But fear not, it probably won't get approved because it introduces a lot of centralization that private businesses wouldn't appreciate.
Well, who knows, sometimes the least expected happens.