Gold bar doesn't produce gold nuggets either. It's about the trust and security in the value. Bitcoin is limited with a known supply and it can't be faked or created by any other way except how it's meant to. The value is agreed upon by the holders, traders and miners through a 24 hour trading.

It is as satoshi says, it is his/her brainchild so we can't dispute the fact. To get a dividend, it needs to be like a stock and bitcoin is not a corporation so investing in it is believing that the value will rise.

This is Satoshi's perspective. But I think It's a Cryptocurrency. Which is to say it is neither because it is something entirely different. It is four things rolled into one cohesive system. A currency, a commodity, a payment system, and a distributed peer-to-peer ledger. You can't examine Bitcoin without taking all four of these into consideration. This is the mistake Krugman makes. He knows a lot about currencies and therefore thinks he knows about Bitcoin despite the fact that he doesn't know anything at all about payment systems and peer to peer ledgers.

It's like claiming you understand airplanes because you're an expert on tires, and airplanes have tires.

Technically true. His goal is quite different compared to most projects that have been made to literally earn funds. Basically he wanted to create a system that is not control by any third party and people can use that to do a transaction on a digital manner. His ideal doesn't much involve self motive to pull an earning process for people but what happened on reality have added a investment approach since people made bitcoin grows into something really valuable.

If you say "Cryptos" so it refers to cryptocurrency/altcoin and Altcoin with POS system offers dividend trough staking.

As anyone said Bitcoin is a commodity since it can be exchange and the price determined by supply & demand, not controlled by centralized entity.

Satoshi was right, we can assume bitcoin as a collectible or commodity if we compare it with stocks that have dividends.
The commodity isn't always meant to be consumable, you can't consume gold but it is a commodity, commodity is a useful or valuable thing. In economics, a commodity is an economic good that has full or substantial fungibility; that is, the market treats instances of the good as equivalent or nearly so with no regard to who produced them. The price of a commodity good is typically determined as a function of its market as a whole. source
Collectibles:   May have aesthetic or   emotional value but derives its pricing from its scarcity (supply) and the perception of others that it is wanted. source
However, bitcoin meant to be an alternative payment method، as a means of payment, as a medium of exchange, in short as a currency.

Does that matter if it's not like other investments that give dividends? satoshi has said it already and it is not a stock. But if you want to get a sort of dividend in the form of interest.

There are exchanges that have interest accounts. You deposit bitcoin to them and they'll give you interest in the rate of p. a.

Only if you're cool with that because me, I'm not. I don't want exchanges to hold my fund for a long time.

I don't think that Bitcoin can be defined in these terms. It's neither stocks, nor commodity. Bitcoin doesn't have dividends because it wasn't made to generate profit in the future. Cryptocurrency = A form of currency.

You absolutely can consume gold, it's used in electronics, jewelry, chemical industry and other fields. The definition of commodity as "anything that can be traded" is so broad that it is useless. Bitcoin is not a commodity, because it has no uses other than being money. If you argue that Bitcoin is a commodity, then US dollar is a commodity too.

Bitcoin is not a collectible, because it doesn't have any "aesthetic or emotional value". It's just a bunch of bits in a decentralized database.