So, my 3 cents ..

[1] Regardless of whether my data ends up in the hands of a manager or a sponsor of a sig campaign - KYC shit^'
[2] In order not to be moved to the "Service (Altcoins)" section, the campaign must pay at least 50% of the reward in BTC^'
[3] For a campaign to be eligible to enter the register, the payment must be at least the average^'
[4] I am not impressed by statements like "what the fuck is the difference that a campaign pays 5 bucks if it pays in bitcoins" ^{[see point 3]}

I am not sure why the manager here complicated. Okay, he holds funds on Binance and maybe this is a method with a small fee, but as I know it's possible to have an account there without passing KYC and internal transaction are also free of charge fees.
So, Binance + internal transfer can be possible without fee and without KYC.

yet if we consider the very low payment rate, I guess the campaign owner doesn’t care much about the participants and the quality of the campaign itself.

Update for the kardiachain campaign

---

Another suggestion is maybe @Mitchell can link this thread in the MAIN (1st post in overview of sig camps) so it won't be easier to miss?

That's a good thing. KYC shouldn't be enforced in signature campaign payments even indirectly

Yes Mitchell add a link to the main topic. Thanks

I agree with you. I don't want to see them in the table but Mitchell and ralle14 expressed their point of view which I respect. The red asterisk should give a warning to users although I find it confusing since signature campaign with payments delay for example could have the same asterisk.
I don't know if it worth modify the red asterisk to
Otherwise, this topic, in addition to scam accusations, reputation and meta subs should point them and participants will learn it the hard way, unfortunately for some of them.

I think it's good idea to open discussion topic and keep Overview thread for updates only.
About KYC to get payment from campaign - personally I would never joing signature campaign which would require KYC in order to get paid. But if some people are fine with such rules, then it's OK. I saw that some people are ready to sell their sensitive private data for much less money. But it's good to read kardiachain campaign decided to change rules for payment after getting negative opinion from community.

I didn't go into details, but I think it's pretty obvious that 1xbit.com is a campaign for the outcast. Who knows, maybe 1xbit.com has a new owner, maybe they even would like to settle all past disputes, but apparently the material costs of these disputes seem more costly to them than throwing a few thousand marketing dollars into the trash every week, (considering the flags and the fact that all campaign participants have red tags). As for the red tags, I noticed that everyone I saw under the auspices of 1xbit.com received their red tags even before applying for this campaign.

I remember seeing a situation in the past, I might confused it with another topic but I recall it was a signature campaign also and it was a mistake where OP forgot to unlock the topic. BetJA appears to be a new service but Little Mouse is running the campaign and holding the funds. Until now I don't see red flags at least for the campaign. I will send pm to Little Mouse to inform him about this.

Edit: Thanks Royse777 for the quick answer moment before sending the pm. Case closed

Same here. I have to admit that I was also a bit confused when I saw the thread.

---

Ah, that explains it. Of course, it doesn't make a very good first impression if the thread is closed again straight away, but if the signatures don't work properly, there is no choice. It's probably because @LittleMouse has only managed a few signature campaigns before.

A small advice @LittleMouse: Just create the thread in Archival first and test everything there and then post it/move it to the appropriate section. Good luck with your bounty campaign!

The Changelog says "Moved Duelbits" but it is not in Mitchell's list of Signature campaigns? Can you please check the post to display the change?

These are the latest updates from Hhampuz from their Signature thread :


https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/5280190.0


Adding it here too, because it is still not added to the list.  

Yobit was running in this forums for years. Although all blames about lack of management, the amount of spammers participating there, almost no action was taken until hilarious involved and somehow regulated it and locked the topic. Once Yobit started running a ponzi-like scheme, among its shady tricks, and asked members to advertise it in their signatures, DT decided finally to move and tagged people red. Obviously this led to some collateral damage and some serious posters received a negative trust.
The case of 1xbit is different since there is scam accusations against it before running the campaign twice. People were warned about the risks but many of them ignored it (since they were involved in a way or another with them for example). In that particular case, DT moved fast and tagged almost all participants red.