I agree that bitcoin doesn't need a free bitcoin house, no one can control it, including the one who created bitcoin, Satoshi Nakamoto, the country of El Salvador was indeed the first country to accept bitcoin but there is no guarantee that in the future the country of El Salvador will still accept bitcoin in their country.

That’s because El Salvador is currently welcoming it, what if it will spit it out next year?

Plus the point is not choosing between China and El Salvador, it’s to choose NOTHING between the two. They need Bitcoin, whether they want to actually use the technology, or want to merely profit from it by purchasing it then selling it later. Both options are A-OK, but Bitcoin doesn’t need a home, it will never need a home.

Just to add some insights provided by a survey by Disruptiva on 1233 locals, concerning the Bitcoin Law:

The survey consists of over 30 questions, of which the following seem relevant to me:
-   77% of the population do not consider it to be good decision to make bitcoin a legal tender there.
-   64% are not willing to receive their salary in bitcoins.
-   Nearly half of them do not know anything about bitcoin. 48,2% declare knowing bitcoin somewhat, and 4,9% state they know a lot about it.
-   75% have got a smartphone to connect to the internet, but 23,5% have no means to connect.
-   67,14% of the respondents that were also merchants, declare that they are not willing to receive payments in bitcoin.
-   60,7% are not in possession of a bank account, and 67,5% do not have a bank card (credit/debit).
-   95% believe that the dollar gives them financial stability (vs 1% that believe bitcoin will).
-   Only 2,5% of the respondents have experience performing crypto TXs previously.
-   40% consider the Bitcoin Law favours large companies/businessmen.
-   25,6% believe bitcoin will improve the economy, but 43,6% believe it will make it worse.
-   The more the age, the less people know about bitcoin, and the less positive they are about it.

Quite a bit of pedagogy is still going to be required over the coming months, and at a fast rate too …

See (In Spanish):
https://www.disruptiva.media/los-salvadorenos-opinan-sobre-la-ley-de-bitcoin-aceptan-y-reciben/

Don't think so, there's not that much developed infrastructure there that are tech related or bitcoin supportive, they might be a hub for cryptocurrency but I don't think that it's going to be a home plus having a home for bitcoin isn't ideal because it implicitly implies that it's centralized and it favors a certain country, bitcoin is for everyone regardless of borders and race.

because it is a regulation from the government of course all the people must follow the regulation.
although later some agree or not, when the regulations are made non-binding forcibly, I don't think it will be a problem. even most think it is the best chosen by the government.

Surveying is not exactly the same thing as voting or bitocracy.  The government still relies on many other factors before integrating and issuing a regulation.  Regulation is an essential tool to govern the country, its citizens.  It depends on the position of each country, even China, North Korea, they are very resolute and almost imposing.
Although El Salvado has succeeded in legal tendering and legitimizing bitcoin into their economy and regulation, they are still a small country, their appeal is still modest but  anyway I agree with the name of the homeland after what they have done.

Yeah and it will be the process in the future if the people really loves this regulation or not but for now things must be followed and they will make some actions of hates when this does not help their economy for this.

it's true as you say, we shouldn't say el salvador is the home of bitcoin, maybe later other countries will legalize bitcoin, actually bitcoin doesn't have to have a house, because all of us in this forum, can be a home for bitcoin,

the government of el salvador has legalized bitcoin, and has made bitcoin a legal currency, we need to support the el salvador government, because when other countries reject bitcoin, el salvador actually comes and graciously accepts bitcoin, but for us to make it el salvador as the home of bitcoin, I don't think it's time yet, considering they're a small country, haven't been able to do much, let satoshi be the home for bitcoin..

It obviously is an evolution of money, but there is a good chance governments won't like this version. Same issue with the US, we will see how they are going to be dealing with Bitcoin once it grows even further. For now the USD is considered a global reserve currency, which makes it very comfortable for the US to just print money and buy stuff. That's what's happening all the time. But what is going to happen when Bitcoin becomes a real alternative, like so big that the US sees the urge to act against it? They won't embrace it forever I think. For now Bitcoin is still too small to threaten the reserve currency status of the USD. They could apply all kinds of shenanigans without even forbidding Bitcoin and still make it impractical to hold or use it.