To get a better conclusion, i would suggest to change the concept "Crypto" by the term "Blockchain" so we can make a fair comparison. As crypto impact are somehow limitd to financial use while the blockchain revolution may be more huge than the internet itself aat it's early years .
Actually, and even by this mass adoption for cryptocurrencies, i think it's somehow similar to the Amazon at its early days with the same number of users actually crypto has, as described in the second Tweet mentioned in OP .

Bitcoin is still too early to take that step in which more people know about it, use, advantages and disadvantages. But that time will come, I say it because the youth more open to technology like to get involved in these things as is the crypto space.
To test a button:

Technically, they are not similar to each other, but in terms of the development of technology and society’s acceptance of this new technology, there is certainly a great similarity. The emergence of the Internet at first raised the fears of many governments and even ordinary people, and they rejected the idea of ​​turning the world into a small village and began looking for charges that It can be directed to the Internet to prevent its spread.
In the case of Bitcoin, too, there is great fear, especially by governments and banks, due to the transition from centralization to decentralization and loss of control. Therefore, they are working on spreading charges about Bitcoin that it is highly volatile and is used to launder money and support terrorism in an attempt to prevent Bitcoin from being accepted around the world.

It isn't. Crypto isn't like the early internet.

Crypto doesn't provide any revolutionary way of payment that we already have. Sure, censorship and decentralization are incredibly useful for certain cases but for most people, they appear to be just purely buzzwords which they don't care about. There is no reason, as of now why people wouldn't choose other payment gateways over Bitcoin. It doesn't mean that there wouldn't be a change in the modus operandi in the future as we refine Bitcoin even more or if the geopolitical landscape changes. The way crypto is getting so actively suppressed and goes against the ideas of the government really differentiates it from the internet.

Your internet connection can be censored, cryptos can't.

Although the term bitcoin is familiar to the internet the concept of blockchain is quite new to many of us. Although blockchain and bitcoin are almost contemporary concepts and there is a lot of information about them on the internet many thought that bitcoin and crypto were like the early internet but its transactions became easier through crypto decentralized blockchain technology.

Blockchain is like the internet. At the same time, the crypto is a child in the blockchain. We know that a new project uses a different method than the other project, but they use the network, and it could be ethereum, trx, eos, bsc, or else. And those network is in the blockchain network.

The internet has many things insides, and that is happening with blockchain. But crypto is a new thing that can not be the same as the internet. Both the internet and crypto will be growing more than now in the future.

Ten years isn't new in my opinion, it's not like I blockchain is a secret technology or anything like that. I think the years of doubt might've delayed the increase of people and the chance of bitcoin from collapsibng thus the collapse was prevented somewhat because not enough people were there to collapse the market.

This is an interesting thread. A stumbled upon a chart recently made by Documenting Bitcoin, taken from research by Crypto.com, which seems to suggest surprising growth. The premise of the analysis is that Bitcoin users are roughly the same as the Internet was in 1997. According to this research if they were to maintain these growth rates, +80% annually approx, by 2024 cryptocurrencies will have about 1 billion users. Over the next few years, it is assumed that Bitcoin and cryptocurrency users could reach 3.7 billion.
https://twitter.com/DocumentingBTC/status/1408072160095215620

Comparing cryptocurrency to the Internet may be a somehow shallow channeled comparison as the latter comprises a more holistic body of network why the latter is only focused on financial services provision, as this user has rightly said it’s better to compare blockchain with the Internet to get a better index to base our arguments.

As a technology you can't compare the two. They are too different, at least in their current implementations. However, as hinted at above when someone says Bitcoin is like the internet, they aren't trying to compare the two's technical aspects. Instead, they are comparing it to that people will rely on it in the future.

The internet, from its very invention boomed. Now, these days a lot of industries, and people rely on the internet for literally everything. Whether that be their job, hobby or to play games. Literally everyone has a use for the internet. Does Bitcoin have a use for everyone? Well, when there's alternatives that exist like fiat currencies, probably not. Not everyone is interested in the decentralized nature, and not everyone wants to be responsible for their own money. You can question their judgement all you want, but I think its still accurate that not everyone will have a use for Bitcoin or cryptocurrencies in general, unless Bitcoin becomes the mainstream currency people use on a daily basis. However, Bitcoin is far from that at the moment, so at the moment we can't really compare the two, at least without any data backing up our claims.