"Data"

Common, just lol, somebody looked at addresses, and if in some ranges have grown more than addresses with a lower balance they have decided some are whales and some are amateurs.
Simple question, if I consolidate all the dust I have in 7 addresses of under 1BTC and send it to my main address what would it mean?
That seven fishes got eaten by an otter? I say more of that change was because of the drop in fees than the "amateur" selling.
The same thing for bigger addresses, this doesn't mean some investors are buying from "amateurs" it might simply mean that amateurs are buying from exchanges and leaving their coins there, as a real amateur would do!
I used to track those movements two years ago in a topic, more to see how bitcoins are getting spread around, but all the data was all over the place every time.
Just for fun, data from two years ago:
https://archive.ph/dG8reBalance, BTC Addresses % Addresses (Total) Coins $USD % Coins (Total)
(0 - 0.001) 13548209 48.44% (100%) 2,772 BTC 25,325,580 USD
[0.001 - 0.01) 6746250 24.12% (51.56%) 26,734 BTC 244,200,701 USD
[0.01 - 0.1) 4863811 17.39% (27.44%) 156,928 BTC 1,433,482,277 USD
vs
Balance, BTC Addresses % Addresses (Total) Coins USD % Coins (Total)
(0 - 0.001) 19553140 51.14% (100%) 3,984 BTC $153,099,304
[0.001 - 0.01) 9662294 25.27% (48.86%) 36,767 BTC $1,412,946,910
[0.01 - 0.1) 5838288 15.27% (23.59%) 190,132 BTC $7,306,682,721
So I see a growth of 1200, 10 000, and 34 000
BTC in the wallets of amateurs. The whales are doomed!!!!

LE.
Fixed some typos!