There's a difference between disrupting traditional finance and overthrowing it.  If anything, Bitcoin will force traditional finance to adapt and improve.  It's probably fair to say that society has a bit of an addiction to debt which isn't getting cured any time soon, so Bitcoin will never completely take over.  I certainly don't see any marxism here.

Decentralization has nothing to do with Marxism. Decentralization respects individual rights, private property, voluntary trading and is based in meritocracy, while marxism goes against all those fundamental principles. Marxism might be against state's opression only on the paper, because in reality it's an opressive mentality making use of the state's power against the individuals of a society, or as they like saying: the sheep people.

In a marxist society you wouldn't own any bitcoins. All your coins would be seized by the communist party or the big brother. Wake up!

Bitcoin has nothing to do with the struggle between the capitalists and the working class. Bitcoin does not even envision taking over the power of the government, not even the economy.

I think this is simply putting too much insinuations with Bitcoin. What now if Bitcoin is for financial freedom? Is it already Marxist? Are we considered Marxist if we fight for financial freedom?

Bitcoin is just a digital currency which is considered more appropriate to the digital growth of the world.

Bitcoin didn't kill and torture anyone or put people in concentration camps for reeducation like twisted marxist ideology was doing, so there is nothing that relates this two.
If you didn't want to be marxist or you didn't agree with them you got killed or sent in gulag or chinese camps, and nobody is forcing you to use Bitcoin.
Marxist and all similar ideologies like fascism or globalism want to have full control over every aspect of human lives including money and economy, while fake ''elites'' become richer, regular people are getting more poor and slave-like.
Bitcoin is decentralized, can not be controlled, and there is no single center, ceo or person that want's control everything, so your theory is simply wrong.

I am not mad at all, I just want freedom and forced equality is anti-liberty.  I agree that bitcoin doesn't fall in any of those ideologies which was the point - bitcoin is about freedom where anyone involved in bitcoin is there because they want to be, not because someone is forcing them to be. 

Communism, socialism and fascism all require the force of government to tell you to do what they want and how they want it.  They will take everything from every single person and then "redistribute" it to someone else.  It means you do not have the right to the products of your mind or the products of your labor.  That is evil and immoral.  It was evil when Mao, Stalin, Lenin, Hitler, Castro, Chavez, Kim Jong-un and all the other authoritarian people who have done so over the millennia imposed their will on people, just as it was evil when the US Democrat party imposed it on the US slaves.  It caused hundreds of millions of deaths over the 20th century because someone who is free isn't going to submit to the slavery imposed by fascism, socialism or communism or any other collectivist authoritarian form of government.

Imposed equality and imposed "equity" means that no one is free.  Those ideologies are about slavery imposed by an elite group on everyone else.

Read the room, dude.  I guarantee you've come to the wrong place to preach about theoretical upsides to Marxism.  This isn't your desired audience.   



I'd suggest equal distribution of wealth probably isn't considered a fundamental tenet of Bitcoin for most people here.

Satoshi never said anything about overthrowing the current financial system, this narrative came later when libertarians have turned their attention to Bitcoin. Satoshi proposed Bitcoin as an alternative to banks and fiat currency.

Marxists and communists hate currency as a concept, in their envisioned communism there will simply be no such thing, so no place for Bitcoin. And since usually they want to build communism through authoritarian socialism  first, there's again no room for Bitcoin, because it would undermine the socialist government.

I recommend you to any online community of marxists and post your thoughts on Bitcoin there and see how they will react.

OP, the Honey Badger don’t care. Bitcoin is merely a tool/solution developed by Satoshi Nakamoto, which he believed might be useful against a financial system that is controlled, and its rules are decided by an exclusive CABAL. Your opinions are respected, but if you say it’s “the truth”, or it’s “the path”, is debatable.

But some people are more equal then others... just look wealth status of all leaders produced by this communist ideology, all of them are filthy rich.
Bitcoin also made some people reach but there was no forced wealth distribution, forced reeducation and camps involved in this process.

And this is something impossible to achieve because there would always be someone who received share of that wealth (let's say Bitcoin) earlier than someone else, and he will have advantage over people who received their share after him.
Not to mention ruling class of that system who are always getting richer in this utopia like wealth distribution, then they introduce inflation and hyperinflation as next step that will make rest of the people more poor.