Mister Craig W supposedly said the latest court ruling means or proves he is indeed Satoshi. So if you really believe he is back then go and worship CW.

Meanwhile the true wallet that everyone needs to be signed to prove he/she is the owner of it has never touched or budged.

There is no obsession from the majority of Bitcoiners about Satoshi. Stop feeding it.

We never know how much bitcoin that the creator has, that 321 btc balance could be only one of his many wallets just like the people who has high amount of bitcoin, they must be seperate it into multiple wallets.
Also we can not confirm the owner of the wallet is really satoshi who created bitcoin, i think it's better to keep it as a mystery and never revealed because that's the unique thing about cryptocurrency, we never know who is the real creator and what the creator doing with it right now.

Mate, you might want to at least point us to what specific wallet addresses you're referring to so we actually have something to check lmao.

I think that most of the time that those claims arise are mostly due to the fact that an output from an address (around 2009-2010) happened recently. Truth to be told, satoshi probably has thousands of address and the best thing that we can try to make is to guess what address might be his. If we're talking about older addresses being suddenly active, we have this thread[1] on Twitter where someone spent BTC (on May 2020), from an address from 2019.

What I find more interesting is the amount of deep analysis that try to uncover the amount of BTC that satoshi may have. For that effort I recommend anyone reading any of the links posted here[2]. This[3] article presented an analysis - made from a bitcointalk user[4] - that estimated satoshi having around 1 million BTC spread in thousands of addresses. Recent studies[5][6] - 2020 - were made using the same analysis technique and the quantity is near the one previously guessed.

If we want to extrapolate satoshi addresses by the transactions that he/she/they did, then this thread[6] provides a really good information regarding the 10 BTC that were sent from satoshi to Hal Finney[6], which makes shows that at least the address 12cbQLTFMXRnSzktFkuoG3eHoMeFtpTu3S is from satoshi.

---

[1]https://twitter.com/nic__carter/status/1263130214726582272
[2]http://satoshiblocks.info/about.html
[3]https://bitslog.com/2013/04/17/the-well-deserved-fortune-of-satoshi-nakamoto/
[4]https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=24826
[5]https://blockchair.com/bitcoin/address/1Q2TWHE3GMdB6BZKafqwxXtWAWgFt5Jvm3
[6]https://blockchair.com/bitcoin/transaction/828ef3b079f9c23829c56fe86e85b4a69d9e06e5b54ea597eef5fb3ffef509fe

Maybe put some links and the address you are referring to, that way we can also check if the news is true or fake.

From what I read from the posts above, it seems like it's not the real Satoshi, and therefore I don't think it's a big news.
The logic is very simple, if it's really the real satoshi, then it's already in the headlines in the crypto space as it's indeed a big news.

 Community, what do you think about Satoshi's account ending its silence?

Yes, I agree. I mean, we all acknowledge that Satoshi is the reason why we are all able to know and enjoy bitcoin today but regardless its identity being disclosed, I don’t think that we have a say or we could do something about it really. And honestly, with the activeness or inactiveness of their presence, even on the minds of the users, I don’t know if it really ever has effects on the market.

It didn't happen so nobody cares.

So some person created an account named Satoshi Nakamoto and submitted a link to an NFT of the same forum thread; and you actually believe this crap?