YES - here we go, hodlonaut's team have come out ALL GUNS BLAZING and bringing the
judge up to speed with Bitcoin and some history regarding Satoshi and then on the shady
history surrounding CSW's previous deceptions.

The memory stick from a BBC reporter is interesting and the KPMG report is a great strike.

Following > https://nitter.it/bitnorbert

Thank you o_e_l_e_o

https://twitter.com/bitnorbert/status/1569219672754757632

https://twitter.com/bitnorbert/status/1569220917644955649

first shot aimed at CSW. perfect hit
hope it hurts CSW

I'm not sure I follow why this is? Surely whether or not CSW is Satoshi (he isn't) is core to determining whether or not Hodlonaut's statements were libelous? If the judge rightly finds that CSW is not Satoshi, then any statements saying he is not Satoshi are not libel are simply become a statement of fact (legally speaking of course, since such statements are already factual).

This individual is employed by CoinGeek (which is a BSV shill site owned and operated by Calvin Ayre) and lists himself as the founder of a BSV based company in Florida, so expect a very biased interpretation from these tweets.

Lol. We are still on Hodlonaut's opening statement and already CSW has started his shenanigans.

the judge wanted to make it clear that CSW was not to use the trial verdict as "proof of satoshi" if the verdict was to give CSW a win

its not a case of getting to prove he is..
its about hodlonaut having an opportunity to prove that hodlonauts comments are fair description of CSW (scammer and fraud)

eg
imagine i seen someone with obviously dyed ginger hair. and i insulted them
its not for them to prove they are naturally/born ginger.
nor does a verdict in their favour mean they are now biologically in their genes ginger. nor is it even about them being temporarily ginger

basically. if i know they dyed(faked) their hair to be ginger. and i called them a "fake plastic orange" .. thats fair i win

if while ginger. i said "eww your a dirty blonde" where it some how lost them their job or lost them money. then i lose.

its not about getting the person i insulted to prove they are a real ginger
nor does any verdict win/lose/draw mean it proves that person is a real born ginger

its about was my insult a fair representation of what i can see and based on available evidence what i can believe to be a informed opinion about the person i see as being a fake ginger where its evident that many already thought and know he is a fake ginger, and that calling him one is just matter of fact freedom of speach

He is following the case right there in Norway but, he's a paid shill for CSW working for coingeek
Why does CSW need 9 lawyers to defend him, if he is Satoshi ? a lot of reporters are shilling for CSW, hodlonaut has 2 lawyers lets see how it goes down.

^
Yea I' m not going to be following that, I was thinking It would be interesting to see what the
'other side' are reporting....
....but then again, I couldnt be bothered.

So yea I'll stick with bitnorbert. Its great to get the running commentry.

kurt spent more time talking about the layout of the court room and how well groomed and dressed they were.
then spent 5 minutes talking about how hodlonauts team were mentioning the CSW past (but he worded it as if hodlonauts team were describing CSW as if csw was involved in bitcoin in 2008)

he then said "for all those not up to date with everything.."
and then went on a rhetoric of how in his bias view he feels how the history plays out where he began with the silly stuff of pretending CSW was involved/thinking up bitcoin as far back as 2005(facepalm) .. i stopped watching at this point.

its was basically a publicity video of fake biography creation.. not a court room drama play by play of what was actually being said in the court room

watch Kurt for examples of lying scum comedy entertainment

but look at
twitter.com/bitnorbert for more of a play by play of whats happening in the court room as it happens

How could CSW say such a thing is it that he doesn't understand the basic properties of the bitcoin blockchain?

todays court stuff is CSW's side to talk. and it seems the narrative being set up is this(my opinion of narrative)

(im pro hodlonaut but writing what it appears the CSW side are trying to say)
from 2017 hodlonaut has had a financial incentive to remove competition from the markets by getting things like BSV delisted
where hodlonaut or people beleived to be him under different names set up challenges and campaigns to attack BSV
CSw lawyers mention

looks like CSW team now trying to set the drama of fake biography to try to turn case into a on the record biography of "proof of satoshi" using witnesses (later this week) to say they knew he invented it (facepalm)

seems he wants to use witness testimony as "proof of satoshi"

..
oh and some basic law facts
in civil cases(which this case is) perjury is not a crime. perjury is usually punishable in criminal cases not civil.. which is what i feel CSW is counting on