Are you trying to create a controversy hehehehe? In any case, @fillippone's reaction is normal. I was talking about the people who were criticizing Luke loudly on social media. I reckon as a tax payer, any person should make his tax dollars work for him by asking for assistance from the government. In reality, the government should be there to assist anyone who needs this. This is a right of every citizen.  


If the FBI officer in charge on this case was a cryptocoin user, he might be shaking his head very vigorously in shock and this would appear to vibrate from all of the shaking.

actually legacy is stronger and more battle tested compared to more recent formats
satoshi in 2009 signed funds to hal feeney and done other signed events from the same address (half a dozen) and yet there is no no legacy data/validation/authorisation leakage which has been used for people to steal the fund that still are associated with that legacy address decades later
(many have tried bruting it)

newer formats have opcode additions that ignore checking for signatures(a flaw that has been exploited for other purposes), and also ways to replace transactions
which are weaknesses that have been exploited

also in regards to hot wallets
the amount in hotwallet is subjective. for instance although binance hoards 600k coin it has alot more then 100 coin as its hotwallet, they understand the risks of public access risk of way more then 100 coin, so they only put so much in hotwallet and have used their trade fee's to form a 'insurance' if said hotwallet was hacked(safu)

its recommended is to not risk more then you wish to lose and to take security precautions to mitigate risks* but thats general advice. its not to suggest having X on legacy in hot is more flawed technically compared to someone using 0.x or 10,000x
the amount does not weaken technical security.
*risks is more about personal loss emotional stress mitigation should X funds be lost

its more common sense
EG a leather wallet in your pocket containing fiat has the same security.
however you are more then likely to have funds stolen if you waved it around inview of strangers and/or then allowed strangers to put their hand in your pocket

point being if you put bank notes in a leather wallet and then had it open and accessible to the public. thats the risk.. not that the wallet itself is the risk

again common sense no one should wave their leather wallet around and let strangers have access to it, that was Ljr's failure

i mean from what is said from the latest update. he wants the FBI to investigate attendee's to the conference which he does not know everyone there.. so common sense he attended somewhere with strangers, where (is common sense suggested that) it was there where he had strangers somehow have access to his server to steal his keys or put exploit/trojan on server

it has nothing to do with faucets..
faucets have nothing to do with random people having access to keys, node.
a faucet is where the coin owner willingly donates out portions of his coin to random people that ask for donations