These are what came out from my try for this in AI. Could do much more but I am lazy so can't think of what else to feed the AI to get more good results.
These two are created by Nightcafe AI. I have also tried midjourney which is very good, but you need premium subscription in order to use that unlimited times. But I have tried some with my free trial to create a portrait from my own image, and it was bang on.
As AI is progressing so fast and are getting capable of doing these crazy stuffs, I wonder what it could do to the market if someone use it in wrong way.

thanks, and sorry to disappoint you. But I'm not the girl on the image. It was a totally random AI generated anime face. if you want to see me then here's my own portrait made using midjourney AI.

I would say it's 85% match to my actual face. And the AI did a great job turning my ugly face to this. The facial features are there but slightly changed in order to match the prompt I guess.

they already are. peole use gpt-3 for article content from 2022 already, as for quality all depend on setup and seting you can honestly creat high quality article wit hai.
as for ai art, in the first palce what you mean orignality? concept can be created by you when prompt the generated image,

If you would actually read anything in this thread you'd notice most was soley done by AI indeed, some other pictures were slightly post-edited.
There is such thing as an obviously AI-generated-image anymore. Some are, yes, but in the right hands I bet you would not be able to tell which is which.
AI is not getting smart, it's still very dumb actually. Just read some discussions about chatgpt. That being said, these "AI-apps" are great tools for producers of any kind and are already taken off a ton of workload from real humans.

That is what people say about the risk of quantum computers for bitcoin.

I believe all hackers would have to do is to discover the 12 secret words, and their respective sequence, from 2048 available words.

However, it must be a very powerful and fast program to find the correct solution in an acceptable time period, as there is an insane number of different possible combinations. At some point AIs might become a threat on this matter, but I guess it's too far from happening yet.

As a hobbyist artist, I must say I have got mixed feelings about artificial intelligence and art.
On one hand, I believe it is cool how the technology has advanced to the point a program can understand the concept behind an artistic piece, this was science fiction not long ago. On the other hand, I am afraid this could negatively impact my fellow professional artists, who already struggle to make a living out their passion...

Anyways, cool pictures. OP.

I just want to say that op's images are amazing. My  Internet connection is very weak right now, but I think I'll try playing with AI later. I tried it before with some online services where you could also give prompts and choose styles, but the images, while sort of beautiful, were often too bizarre, usually because of objects not being fully there, faces and bodied generally being muffled or overstretched, etc. Yours are much better. I'd love to hear more about these results. Like, how many tries does it take to make a good image, or how many minutes/hours it took to get all the images in the original post? I see you've mentioned a free trial of 25 images, but also that you've purchased a subscription.

I would say that the technology have slowly killed the living of many people. Usually, those who are not related online/digital but in exchange of it, it is that many opportunities have also opened up but only to those who have a knowledge on online/digital.

Maybe those traditional artist can try upgrading and try doing digital arts because this can be the future. If not then they are free to find a new career. I just do not say that the pictures shared by the OP are all nice. This wasn't the first time I saw this but there is a one thread here last time who upload almost the same pictures. It seems that we are now being invaded by the AI but I still prefer those good old drawings tbh.

Sometimes I just give up when I see the AI isn't understanding what I mean. But I still try changing one word or another on the prompt before. I've never gone too far like 25 renders. I usually go until 4-5 attempts, although many of the results in OP were achieved in one try.

Here it always render pretty fast. I think I've never waited more than 3 minutes. It worths mentioning there is something called "fast" mode. By acquiring the subscription you have 15 hours of renders on this mode. After that, your prompts join a kind of row, where you have to wait other people's renders (in fast mode) to complete first, until you finish yours.

You can ask any doubts in Discord MJ server itself. There is a specific channel for this kind of doubt and people there are very helpful.

Yes, as you can see my Neanderthal on the last image has 6 fingers. Still realistic, but MJ doesn't know counting fingers with precision.

Indeed, a subscription is a must. Paid 30$ on the second tier for a month.

Added to the personal experience of @Kryptowerk, I also wrote mine. I hope it clears your doubts out, @kryptqnick.