Of course, that banker from Ripple pocket them with some leftovers. Back then he announced 5 million to FUD Bitcoin, maybe he just continued feeding their new acquired parrot?, especially now that their system is in panic...

Who burns more energy? The traditional banking/financial system or Bitcoin? The traditional system burns so much more energy the comparison isn't even funny. Just imagine a world without banks, credit/debit cards, exchanges, none of it is needed with Bitcoin.

So it is clear that no matter what they say, they are just a tool for banker's agenda, who oppose Bitcoin because it has render them obsolete.

On the topic of green energy and the electricity industry. At least 50% of customers in the US have the option to purchase renewable electricity directly from their power supplier, which is sometimes referred to as "green power" or "clean power". Green power is available from a variety of suppliers, including utilities, competitive power suppliers, renewable energy certified (REC) marketers, project developers, and nonprofits.

Regarding the number of banks using green energy, it shows that there is increasing availability and interest in renewable energy options in the electricity industry.

Lol! Greenpeace has vested interest in spreading such FUDs. Not sure if Ripple is still funding then, but surely some banking organization is doing the funding here. Only bad part is that, common people might also believe in their FUD. But surely the crypto market will remain unaffected. We have become truly immune from such FUDs. Even Mr. Warren Buffett and Jemie Dimon won't be able to make a dent on the stability of the market.

When the crypto prices go up, a lot of people feel jealous because they have missed the boat already. We can safely ignore such FUDs.

Yes, I read this news today and especially liked the comments on twitter.I liked that many people quickly reacted to the news and answered under their post.I also want to thank you for your site, t contains a lot of useful information for those who are poorly versed in the principle of Bitcoin, you did a great job.

Check out this thread  over in collectibles

https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/5446176.0

Order some stickers !

As one member said in this thread …
“ My thought is every sticker hoarded by a collector and believer of BTC avoids the chance of someone getting tricked by the propaganda.  I ordered ones for several relatives...lol”

US a only I’m afraid 

Ahh if not Greenpeace accidentally outing themselves as funded by the other cryptocurrency.

In any case, I firmly believe that we still have ways to go to make bitcoin as clean as it can be, because let's face it, there are millions if not hundreds of millions of small-time miners out there mining bitcoin with their residential electricity, which comes from the burning of fossil fuels. But the efforts that this industry did in order to combat pollution is something that I've never seen any other company or industry do in their decades of runtime. I think eco-protest groups should stop looking at bitcoin and throwing dirt at its name and actually go for big companies that are obviously the grave offenders of deteriorating the environment.

The sad and ironic thing of course is that Bitcoin is GREAT for the environment. People just don't understand how it works and its incentives. If environmentalists, Greenpeace included, understood how the market for Bitcoin mining works and what the PoW technology of Bitcoin can do for the energy industry they'd be singing the praises of mining and demanding more support for bitcoin mining. Instead they are attacking bitcoin out of ignorance.


I can't really bad mad at them. It's just misinformation and lack of education on a subject very few people are educated on. Given the standard information that goes around on the internet about bitcoin mining this is the reaction I would expect of anyone. But we NEED to start getting people educated on how great bitcoin mining is for the world. Politicians are starting to actively attack Bitcoin mining now and we need to educate them before they actually start making bad anti-bitcoin laws out of ignorance and lack of education.

The people who care about the environment would be more supportive of bitcoin than even the s**t people who don't care about the world, they just don't have the bitcoin education to know that their goals and bitcoin mining are aligned with one another.

The Skull of Satoshi is now a PoW defender!

Artwork (copyright) by me.

#EndTheFUD

then we can all predict that Greenpeace is the party paid by a group to attack bitcoin on the grounds that bitcoin is not environmentally friendly and bad for the future of the environment because it has not changed the code.

the skull campaign made by Greenpeace seems to have failed and instead, it became a counterattack for them lol

mr. mars joined the green planet campaign so that the battery cars he sells are selling well in the market lol

paid group greepeace continues to claim that bitcoin mining is one of the causes of the worst environmental damage on this planet but what about nickel and cobalt mining ^{(as you say)} don't these mines destroy the environment and give heavy pollution.

---

hey greenpeace do you close your eyes to all this shit