There are several days till a celebration of Bitcoin Pizza Day and it's good time for sharing some information that many people are not aware about Laszlo Hanyecz and his actions of purchasing pizzas with bitcoins.
People thought he spent 10000 bitcoins for 2 pizzas but in fact he spent more than 10000 bitcoins and purchased more than 2 pizzas.
It probably doesnt matter anymore how much exactly Laszlo spent to buy those pizzas using bitcoin. The important thing is that it wasnt just two pizzas and he actually spent more than 10,000 BTC on various purchases not just pizza to regret of. What I think is more interesting to talk about now are the what ifs. Like what if Laszlo never made that transactions? Would it have affected bitcoins price or development in the future? I believe it would have changed how bitcoin was adopted and distributed because something changed. Right?
What matters of the story is that someone believed it was possible to buy pizza with bitcoin back then. So what if no one believed him or accepted his offer at that time? Would bitcoin still exist the way it does today? This is the kind of discussion I want to read more of.
You must like to live in fantasylandia.
When it comes to the past, I personally prefer to analyze what happened and try to figure out what happened and to get a good reading on what happened perhaps why it happened, and there can even be various versions in regards to what happened, what is the significance of what happened, where we are right now..which is based on how we got here, and how we got here might also help to inform us where we might be going.
When it comes to the future, we can have a large number of possible scenarios about various scenarios that might be possible, and some of the scenarios have higher probabilities than others, and perhaps we might have 9 or more scenarios with varying odds that might range between 37% for the higher end and 0.5% for the lower end, and so then maybe the higher end scenarios would be what we expect to be most likely to happen, even though historically sometimes lower end scenarios end up playing out and then once they play out, they affect the future possibilities based on what actually happened rather than what might have had happened, and sure yet they happen, they are somewhat locked in, even though we still might argue about what exactly happened and try to understand its significance.
There could be some ways in which exploring alternative historical perspectives that we might be able to gain a better perspective in regards to where we are at and where we might be going, even though I still tend to not get too excited regarding the discussion of hypotheticals that did not end up happening, since the are likely less relevant in terms of figuring out where we are at, how we got here and where we might be going.
Sometimes we might agree on a lot of the facts of where we are at and how we got here, yet we might have differing perspectives and opinions in regards to where we might be going - which surely investing in bitcoin can have some of these differing scenario elements, and we might not even need to be correct about the specifics of where we are going as long as we get it right directionally, and so for example, we likely are better off to invest into bitcoin rather than not to invest into bitcoin, even though it may well be that 99% of the world's population is either not at all invested in bitcoin or they are way under invested into bitcoin.