But don't just paint the pretty part of the story. In that idyllic scenario you paint, the price would easily be in 3 figures and the use as a currency would be relegated to the deep web, casinos and a few P2P-trades.

In general, it is more in line with their ideology. That of the Democrats is based on the state as the best guarantor of rights and freedoms, while that of the Republicans is based on the individual. Although individual politicians may differ from this line or even be hypocritical, as when right-wing politicians devote themselves to increasing taxes and public spending.

The guy is doing a great job to add that phrase in his talks because his main intention is to gain support from the crypto-community and fortunately he's almost close to getting that support. If we consider his proposal for Bitcoin then it makes sense that the ones who are into crypto-world and into Bitcoin will high likely take him as their savior in such hard times. His chances of getting votes from Bitcoin users is a confirm thing.

But still the question arises that how would someone like Ron DeSantis compete against someone like Donald Trump the former president of United States, or Biden the current president of United States? The simple and highly knowledgeable answer should be "Not even a single chance," because the former ones have far more superiority in getting votes from public than DeSantis.

However, if we consider the point of view of the Bitcoin investors and its users then the they are mainly in favor of Ron DeSantis because the guy is like a light in darkness, and can be a savior for Bitcoin and crypto-currencies in the New world. His love for Bitcoin and crypto-currencies is so intense that any true crypto-enthusiast would take his side in such situation. Other than this guy almost everyone is somehow trying to oppress or regulate Bitcoin and other crypto-currencies in the United States.

With the current knowledge that I have with the current presidential candidates, the race would probably be between the two reelectionist: Donald Trump and Joe Biden, don't see much online presence on other candidates so I assume that they're not a popular pick or I might be wrong. Between these two, I don't see any improvement in bitcoin especially if they were to continue the policy that they've had in their re-election.

An invention, especially with time, ends up differing from the initial idea of its inventor. When the cell phone was invented in 1973, the purpose was to be able to talk on the phone without a cable, moving around. It did not occur to anyone at the time that it could serve as a flashlight, for example.

This kind of decision will certainly be hard to take even if he becomes the president, his stands towards crypto although will help but decision like this passes through stages that even him can’t just pass a bill over. They’re far too many anti bitcoiners for a new president to just tackle. Any decision made by the state will certainly affect the global adoption of it, so it won’t just be an easy task even if he is honest about what he saying now. I just feel it is a political propaganda for his campaign to get rallied behind by bitcoiners just like we are doing.


And that is why the door for improvement proposal aren’t closed. It’s primarily role is an alternative payment method but people have seeing other ways to earn from it and I don’t see anything bad but it shouldn’t be tempered with in such a way that it defeats it main purpose.

I don't live in the US, but I think that choosing the head of the state is an important process, and the choice shouldn't be merely based on one policy issue.
We all have different values, and there are no perfect candidates or perfect parties, even, but Ron DeSantis is not a casual guy at all. It's like a more radical version of Trump. Yeah, he's supportive of Bitcoin, and that's a plus. But he's also a strong opponent of contemporary democratic values, he's a very conservative person. He is against gun control, anti-immigration, against acknowledgement of racial tensions (and everything else he calls 'woke'), a proponent of lowering corporate taxes, and pro-life. When choosing him as president, one should look at all of that.
But I really hope that since he's playing the Bitcoin part, his main contestants will be pro-Bitcoin as well, even if just to ensure that he doesn't win.

Yes exactly. A lot of the republicans support in this country is made of of single issue voters. Meaning they don't care how horrible a politicians is, or how bad things get in the country, as long as the politicians supports the one issue. I really hope bitcoiners won't be so blind as to fall into that black hole. Bitcoin growth and support in America is of course important, but it should never be the single issue people vote based on, and nobody should ever be voting republican (I mean, period, but also nobody should be voting for corrupt extremist republicans, aka all of them, just to try to help Bitcoin a little bit.

Bitcoin in its current form and the small size of the market will not have an effect that makes it at the forefront of the political plans of any American politician, from a seat in Congress to the highest position, which is the President of the United States.it must be that trading is not limited to the central platforms or be rich model, but rather using it as a currency alongside the US dollar.
This thing will not happen in two years, and perhaps more than 10 years, so it is early for Bitcoin to have a role in politics and political tensions.

Therefore, I do not think that such news will bring about real change or contribute to that.