With the Electricity and the Internet, you mentioned I don't think the government or bank has something to lose rather than benefit from its existence. On the other hand, the bank knows with more people investing in bitcoin their sales and profit from investment will drop, people who buy shares, bonds, and stock who withdraw their funds and invest in bitcoin will have an effect negatively on them. In my country, the excuse government gave concerning Bitcoin then was that it was a scam and fraudulent means for youth.

The fastest way for people to get to know someone or something is to be a part of a drama. This is also how bitcoin gets all the attention when it comes to its conflict with governments and banks. When there is disagreement and it is difficult to control, the pressure on bitcoin will be greater. Since then, people will gradually notice this conflict, and eventually someone will become interested and learn more about their benefits. However, no matter how the government tries to suppress it, bitcoin will continue to grow strongly and will make other objects dependent on and accept the use of bitcoin.

It's a bit of misconception that banks are anti-Bitcoin. Many of them do business with exchanges and profit from all the transactions fees that come when people deposit or withdraw from exchange. Some banks prohibit crypto-related transactions, but not necessarily because they are afraid of crypto, they likely afraid of responsibility that might come if some of those transactions are linked to crime and black markets.

As for governments, in general they don't want Bitcoin to be used instead of fiat, it's harder to trace, harder to tax. But only a few governments in the world actually banned mining or trading.

You took it way too far from what I meant. The quarrel happens online and bitcoiners also take it to the streets to point projectors with bitcoin logo on banks and top governmental offices. Such thing happened in Frankfurt. Whereas on the internet it's been multiple arguments and posts from bitcoiners that shade on banks and their activities. Nobody is expecting a rally, as the banks are not taking it to the streets too, it's all an online dispute. For instance, if the JP Morgan CEO makes a bad comment on bitcoin, you'd see lots of negative responses from bitcoiners towards the CEO's point of view. That's the kind of quarrel I meant on my post, thanks.

That was then when bitcoin was firstly established government was against bitcoin but it was not generally like across the country it is different country government that is was against the development of Bitcoin burner the stress and the frustration of Bitcoin by government has reduced so I believe that we cannot say that god bank and the government is against bitcoin again like before

And it's no secret, business competition, of course. Perhaps, they are overwhelmed now that BTC growth is inevitable. Banks also require users to deposit and BTC as well. But if you look at current developments, it's up to the issue of skepticism or not from the government or other financial institutions, I note that the current circulation of money is mostly crypto and banks are just bridges to be able to store funds to be able to buy coins and tokens on trading platforms and terminals to withdraw fiat ..

Not only your country but most other countries have legalized bitcoin and cryptocurrencies as commodities or property. But I don't think they're afraid of bitcoin, they've seen its tax potential and don't want to ignore it. Second, I think there is no reason for them to accept bitcoin as a currency, whether centralized or decentralized. Because they're doing well with the fiat they've created, only people like us have a problem with fiat and need to replace it. But with them, they are content with what they have.

Bitcoin is decentralized and has no control from a central bank or government agency, which somewhat reduces the ability of governments to intervene in the economy.

Government finds it difficult to control and sees the potential money laundering problem in Bitcoin.
Banks see it as an alternative to their monopoly and are threatened about their future existence although banks have a lot more functions that Bitcoin does not have like lending/depositing to start with.

Banks have started blockchain as a technology for their application and services but not bitcoin explicitly. Of course my take on this is that both will co-exist and eventually people will learn to use banks for its niche uses that Bitcoin cannot provide and use bitcoin for payments parallely. I am skeptical about DeFi and its uses and have observed that the buzz has reduced a lot in the recent year. How much they will complement bitcoin remains for the future.

Regarding Bitcoin players arguing with each other, this can have many different causes. Some participants may have different views on the development of Bitcoin or their investments may be affected by its price movements. Also, like any other community, the Bitcoin community also has different interest groups and viewpoints, which can lead to conflicts and arguments.

There are various reasons why governments and banks are against Bitcoin.  Financial control, Bitcoin is a decentralized cryptocurrency that is not controlled by any government or financial institution. This could reduce the financial control of governments and traditional banks. Anti-money laundering and illicit activity, due to Bitcoin's decentralized nature, it can be used to carry out illegal activities or launder money more easily than traditional financial means. This raises concerns for governments and banks in regulating the use of currency. Lack of active efforts on regulatory compliance and user protection, due to lack of legal standardization, security, and user protection, Bitcoin may make participants vulnerable to fraud or loss their money. This causes concern and negatives the image of Bitcoin in the eyes of governments and banks.