Satoshi didn't break any rules but simply created a set of rules or a protocol that Bitcoin must always execute.  As far as governments are concerned, if someone were to look at El Salvador they would only see a hole in the water, while if one looks at the adoption from below like the bitcoin jungle then one can speak of success.

I hope so and wish them that they'll open their mind to this.
But the fact wasn't, governments have different approaches and perspectives when it comes to crypto like Bitcoin.
Some governments may have reservations about the decentralized nature of crypto and the potential risks they perceive, such as volatility, money laundering, or tax evasion.  As we can see, others may be cautious due to concerns about the impact on their existing financial systems or the potential loss of control over monetary policies.

There's nothing our governments can do if we want to have or use Bitcoin, we can still have it anonymously and this is why Bitcoin was created, to have full control over our funds and there's no need intermediary.

Even though countries like El Salvador have adopted Bitcoin, it does not mean that all other countries will follow suit (even though it would be the wisest decision to). The more developed the country, the more involved they are with debt and banking, the more they are invested in keeping their inferior systems alive and the less likely they are to evolve and adopt Bitcoin into their system.

I believe that developing countries will thrive over the next 5 - 10 years and countries that want to exit the grip of USD will be able to, which is great. What is bad is the ramifications that the US will place on these countries for doing so, and additionally watching their system crumble before making changes.

By making BTC centered of anonymity and privacy to the users global that is the protocol I mean.
They do, because any Governments that accepted BTC in their countries enjoy BTC. If I may ask who are government? The people in a particular country are government, since the people that have idea on BTC are using it to grow their business and also use it to attract more customers by purchasing goods and pay with BTC. Like country  El Salvador are you trying to tell me that they don't enjoy BTC.

Theres only one country for now that we can see following the steps of El Salvador and its The Kingson of Bhutan who will be using their waterfalls to generate electricity to mine Bitcoin. Both country are just banking that BtC will win, they may really be in the right path though. And we could see this because even US is not banning BTC nor considering BTC as Security.

The result of the adoption of BTC in the country will need to prove it help the people otherwise it won't make much difference. But if its doing positive effect, many will see it good.

It only need one countryIf one country using the Congo river to generate power and mine BTC and I think more countries in Africa will also follow. Its possible.

Santoshi Nakamoto didn’t break any protocol either existing or non existing before he brought about the idea of bitcoin. He only thought of a way for us to be financially free and independent of any financial institution or government to take care of our funds.


Not so many of the countries accepted bitcoin because of what it is and how it operates, some did that to enjoy the taxation that’ll come with it when citizens of their countries use them for transactions.


I believe some of them didn’t just rejected it because they don’t want it or like the idea about bitcoin. Some did that in order not to be the first nation to adopt it and later fails. Some are just skeptical to see how it’ll eventually becomes of nations that first legalise them in order for them to take the next step. El Salvador has taken the bold step, in no time in the future, they’ll reap the rewards of their investment in bitcoin.

I also share the same opinion. If a country is lacking in terms of economy, such as in Africa, large-scale Bitcoin mining can boost the economic value of that country. In my opinion, this is the best and most effective way for a country to transform itself quickly. If the regulations and policies for Bitcoin mining are allowed and the proceeds from mining are used for the welfare of the people and the development of infrastructure, it can significantly improve the country's situation. Ultimately, it is up to the country itself to decide whether they want to pursue this approach or not.

It doesn't have to imitate what El Salvador just did. El Salvador's president and probably some of its high local authorities have come to understand what Bitcoin really is. That's why it should be made for most countries and people, to understand what Bitcoin is doing and what it is used for. Whether there is or there is no government intervention and adoption, Bitcoin is for people and people is for Bitcoin. That's why it's here to stay and it just keeps on growing over time.

Read a book and stop writing first grade scribble!

"Satoshi the breaker of protocols", maybe the breaker of your ***** ass!

Satoshi only helped realize an idea that has been proposed for decades. He just made things possible for the likes of Wei Dai, Nick Szabo, and countless other cryptographers that put forth ideas on decentralized currencies to coexist with fiat. There isn't any protocol broken, nor any laws bent on the creation of bitcoin. Those things only happened when bitcoin started to have some valuation, and people began to trade it with fiat currency. Those are completely different things.