Considering the fact that MicroStrategy is a leader in business intelligence for worldwide services as a centralized platform and doesn't see any plans of slowing down soon, it is good to see them also invest in Bitcoin which is a decentralized blockchain backed cryptocurrency. The company and Michael Saylor must foresee a myriad of blockchain applications related to business intelligence available to Bitcoin users, starting with the blockchain network itself. As a 1% stakeholder in Bitcoin, it would be interesting to see if MicroStrategy continues to build out the Bitcoin ecosystem by empowering existing users with new tools, software, data and analytics that could make the network safer, scalable and secure over time thus increasing the value of Bitcoin as a result.

The network only can be supported if people run more Bitcoin full nodes or more miners join the network and increase total hashrate of the network as well as config their mining rigs to different mining pools with thoughtful consideration on what pools to participate in. Because with more full nodes, the Bitcoin blockchain will be stored more decentralized and more nodes mean more decentralized validators of Bitcoin blocks. Choosing mining pools with intention to avoid very big pools will help to reduce risk of 51% attacks.

It is about risk of price impact when big institutional investors like MicroStrategy sell their bitcoins massively. However, if we talk about selling, we should also mention about their considerable impacts on price when they are buying massively in the past.

Is it fair if we only discuss about their selling impacts and skip or try to hide their past buyings which help Bitcoin to rise up a lot?