I thought Mt. Gox was an exchange that was hacked and the funds were recovered and put under a trustee Nobuaki Kobayashi. The funds belong to the victims so we cannot generalize that the exchange is a smart holder of Bitcoin. The only reason why the funds are is still available today is that it was recovered and waiting to be disbursed to Mt Gox customers.
The picture in the original post is Dorian Nakamoto and not Satoshi Nakamoto.

Providing your essential needs is more important than investing because you have to be alive to invest. But sometimes investing comes with determination and sacrifice. Bitcoin can be bought in bits so low-income earners could invest by applying DCA. There is no convenient time to invest because there will always be needs to meet. So instead of keeping money in bank accounts buying Bitcoin gradually would be a good option.  Bitcoin is a volatile asset so taking a loan to invest in the coin is highly risky and should never be the case. Sometimes you have to wait for about four years to make profit from Bitcoin and the interest from the loan will be greater than the profit from investment.

At the beginning of Bitcoin, some of the luckiest people bought Bitcoin at a very low price. But after that some people got fear of loss because of misguideness they decided to sell their BTC and did it, some of them bought Bitcoin and saved it in their wallet just to hold it for a long period and unfortunately they lost their wallet access and they will regret to the whole life. But in these, some save Bitcoin and save their wallet access too because they know the potential of Bitcoin that one day it will go to a very big price and now one can buy it and the interesting thing is that they bought a lot of Bitcoin not 2 or 100 but in thousands. These people took risks at that time and now they are happy. We call them whales now and they are the ones who change the market scenario by moving it up and down in it's prices.

That information is not accurate, maybe old? Because there are few more companies that are not Bitcoin holders, why isn't Black Rock on the list? I guess its because the information is old, anyways, the combined number of Bitcoin is 21 million and only 3 million is with these people or company, damn, there are lots of Bitcoin still available to go, but I stand with my point, this data is inaccurate.

If you are reading this right now and you are feeling like you missing out because you don't have the capability do not kill yourself, there is nothing to be on rush about, find a source of income or if you have money that you can spare for few years, use it to buy the  Bitcoin that's within your limit, these companies are multi million dollars company, they have the money to easily accumulate Bitcoin, do not feel left out and do not turn criminal because you want to buy Bitcoin, you will still make profit with whatever amount you invest.

Governments generally don't accumulate BTC for investment purposes, they just auction them whenever possible after they acquire them. And many of the entities in the OP hold BTC only for custodial purposes. Grayscale's real BTC stash is much smaller, maybe to the tune of a few tens of thousands from fees accumulated from their GBTC instrument. But bear in mind that DGC who owns GBTC is also indebted through a bankruptcy case because they lost a lot of BTC that they lent out to irresponsible traders such as FTX's "Alameda Research" and Three arrows capital.

And Robin Hood holds BTC on behalf of people. They too charge fees but their real self-holdings aren't to the tune of 100k BTC.

Apart from Satoshi Nakamoto that hold 1.1M BTC according to the list you provided in the OP, most of the other holders are either exchanges that are into bitcoin and crypto business, and government that invested that high amount of money to save their country's economy because they realize the potential in bitcoin and they invested in order to gain for their business and their country.

It will be difficult for a single individual to hold such huge amount of bitcoin, that is no single person's name is listed in the list because it will be very difficult for a single person to hold big amount of bitcoin; although there are people that are holding bitcoin because they are business persons and are saving their funds in bitcoin, and probably, some of them accumulate their bitcoin through DCA method.

Individually as late bitcoiners, I think DCA method is the best for us to keep accumulating the little fractions of bitcoin we can afford.

We are just dust when compared to other companies or exchanges because it is clearly not comparable, as for the government holding BTC is it buying or confiscating from some platforms or other criminal acts? It's clear they did that and the government is always entitled to its ownership.

I myself even continue to encourage investment and continue to accumulate BTC as much as possible to spend, it is according to our abilities but over time with a long time surely the bitcoin that is owned will be more, at least by reaching 1 BTC alone it has become the hope of many people for the middle to lower class.

I mean people have different capability about what they can afford and if you really compare us with the big company based on that picture and then I don't know what to say. Maybe in the background, most of us are collecting Bitcoin but with the small amount. I don't really like being generalized if being compared with big tech company like this. It doesn't boost your motivation.

We do not have to wait for years, collecting 1 Bitcoin for an ordinary Joe is difficult even now.  The price of BTC is really high @$36k+ and that is worth a million in my currency.  The ordinary wage of a minimum earner in my country is around $11 a day, so just imagine how long it will take for an ordinary employee to buy the whole Bitcoin that costs around $36k+.

So I think it is good to start DCA-ing now to shorten the time to accumulate 1 BTC regardless of ow much we earn, because the price of Bitcoin might double in the near future, once it enters the bullish market and starts to surge.

Will CZ pay his charge in Bitcoin?  It would be a World first such thing.  Otherwise The United States will only continue to hold on to their Bitcoin holdings or sell them while CZ has to SELL Bitcoin to pay his charges in Dollars.  Which is a hit in the stomach for Bitcoin.  Temporarily.

-----

I am wondering how they are worked out too.  There was only one country I heard of which was actively purchasing Bitcoin or holding on to the seized Coins.  It was Croatia I believe.

Well of course the most sensible approach is to accumulate and save as much crypto as you can while it's still this cheap. I've been collecting as much crypto myself cause I know for sure sooner or later we're going to hit another milestone when the bull run arrives. Rather be an early bird and carry all the risks that come with trusting the market this early, than let yourself become a follower out of your fear of losing money and be late to the party.

To those of you who are still a little hesitant about investing in cryptocurrencies, and are able to practically invest in it given the circumstances of your finances, Here's what I have to say: One way or another, you're going to lose your money. So would you rather lose it without ever seeing anything come from the money you worked so hard for, or would you finally take charge and start learning about how you could invest and make money work for you. Doesn't even have to be crypto at this point, just you outright learning about investing.