Why do you think that Bitcoin is here to take over the world economy? Your understanding is flawed. Bitcoin is just a digital currency, it has not been introduced to fight the current economy or to phase out the Fiat currency system. So please come out of this mindset.

Also Bitcoin is not capable of handling the transaction volume that happens worldwide. It is more often investment rather than a currency. There is no war to fight. Bitcoin will flourish alongside the mainstream economy and not by removing it.

Firstly, I'm not a fan of being bias in nature, I like to call a spade a spade not to think of anything in my own favour.
For the case of Bitcoin, puting Altcoins and fiat for one to be biased about any of them. what you should consider first is; is this biases negative or positive, one can be positively or negatively biased because both the Altcoins has negative effect on Bitcoin. for Altcoins they where all introduced for a selfish reason which we all know so being biased has to do with what effect does it have on Bitcoin, is it a negative or positive effect? Every stands for its own purpose not even the fiat is in competition with Bitcoin, fiats currency works Vice Viz with Bitcoin.

Fiat tends to be a tool for the government to control its citizens but it doesn't stand against the welfareness of Bitcoin hence it has been in existence before Bitcoin.

Bitcoin is not to be blamed neither Altcoins nor Fiat for anything that is going on or happening in the world now like I said before everything stands for its purpose Bitcoin is an evolution and fiat too was an evolution as of when it was introduced.

We are supposed to get used to this kind of experience because it's not happening for the first of its kind, bitcoin exist on its own, every other altcoins came after it to make thesame lookalike project like bitcoin and name them all manners of names, the mistake that government is doing is not realized yet by them, if not they would have known that bitcoin is not the one they are going after, instead all other cryptocurrencies which so many of them are constituting nuisance in cryptocurrency, you could also see that the government cannot stop bitcoin adoption, they can only attack all it's centralized exchanges and the rest, governments should go after shitcoins and not bitcoin.

Yeah. This is one reason I am grieved about with the government making restrictions on Bitcoin not acceptable in such respective societies without considering of its masses are interested about it.
In my country, I don't know if it is for security reasons or the biased nature of the mindsets of the government not having any form of authoritative capacity in governing of Bitcoin since it has been a non-custodial decentralized digital currency.
I came from a place where the government is selfish in the sense that they feeds fat and fills their personal pockets with the public funds and legally extorrtsy its citizens personal incomes as revenues where to generate their own income.
As though since they don't have the governing power on Bitcoin, they situated Bitcoin and Crypto currencies as a whole on suspension mainly towards the governance levels of financial transactions while it is authorize acceptable at the private levels where individual is liable to decide if yes or no, I will accept or not accept Bitcoin.

So if the above mentioned locations governmental system doesn't want to accept Bitcoin in its governments sectors, why depriving its citizens from it? Is their a negative tag in Bitcoin that those who are allowed to legally accept it doesn't know about? Or is it that the governments that permits it acceptable in it countries doesn't care about the financial securities of its citizens or what?
This is just one of it I inhaled the grieves about the biases (obstacles) surrounded with Bitcoins

I don't have any swords on me right now, but you can give me the number of your dealer I might order one (just kidding). As BTC investors or traders, or enthusiasts we should not possess habitual baised issues or oppose anything even if it Alts. That's because most of the BTC adopters in the current era are here to earn money and they (including me) will prefer to avail as many opportunities as they can. Some will say having alts will decrease the risk involved in investing in crypto because we get to have a chance to diversify our capital and etc. etc.

I will say, just don't ignore or oppose alts, keep an eye on them because not every alt is that bad, some are really good and solving real problems, I hope your swords will not turn to my side, I am not saying BTC is bad but I will say open mind is better than having a close mind. And this is something I also learned a few months back, before it I was also thought BTC was everything even though all of my earnings were in BTC but after seeing the potential of alts (not all, but of few) I was convinced to keep an eye on the alts too.

But as a BTC enthusiast, we should oppose the fiat system and I am still against it because I have learned that they want us to remain their slaves and so dependent on them while there is no need for us to remain one. Everything is so clear and independent but they still made us live like this and even some banks went bankrupt results in the loss of many people. I know you might say, there are insurances, etc., etc. but in my country, the SBP has declared that if any bank goes bankrupt we will not be responsible for it. I mean, the main authority behind these banks saying this then where will people place their funds? I know BTC is here to solve the problem but who will teach those who don't want to and still want to use Banks?

Yes, it won't be easy to get someone to start investing in Bitcoin when they already believe in banks.
This also happened to my family, I just gave them an understanding of what Bitcoin is and what are the advantages and risks.

So investment is the choice and responsibility of each person, it cannot be forced.
There is no point in arguing about whether to invest in Bitcoin or not, just need to learn and understand.

I think we should be biased about fiat and governments but with alts too. If I have to tell on the level of a scale then I will say 90% biased with fiat and governments and 10% with alts, because alts are under BTC and we know that, so we should not compete with our BTC swords against alt's plastic or fake knives. We should oppose fiat and governments not because they are against BTC. Because they are not providing us the financial freedom.

I think you should make a correction that, now even though governments are not against BTC because of ETFs and adoption of it, we can see governments are also adopting BTC and want to make money out of it. And the last reason is we have our darling BTC and its features that make us unique from all and make us fall in love with her.
As a BTC investor, I will say BTC is the best haven if compared with fiat, banking schemes, or alts, due to many reasons. We can't conqueror the global economic challenges with the current state of BTC because of its scalability issues, until they get resolved we should not say BTC can resolve economical challenges.

OP, Bitcoin is not in a war with altcoins or fiat money; it is just there on its own and with its own value. If you understand the ideology of Bitcoin, then you will focus on silently accumulating your bitcoin and also learn more about the technology.

There are Bitcoin miners on this forum, some people that are running nodes of their own, and also some people who have been holding Bitcoin for a very long time now, and these people understand that Bitcoin has a lot of value that it will archive in the future, and there is no way that Bitcoin can be valueless.

 That's why more people are investing in Bitcoin. It's a private asset in which when two users of the same technology decide to carry out a transaction and agree to receive payment in Bitcoin, then it's a p2p transaction that you bot have transacted with without having to visit the bank and have your transaction processed by a third party who knows your identity. Bitcoin is special in its own way.

Others may not unequivocally say it, but it's obvious that Bitcoin supporters are biased against fiat, biased against altcoins, biased against governments, biased against central banks, biased against centralized platforms, and so on. And why not, right? At this point in time, Bitcoin isn't anymore that humble alternative that timidly stays in the corner waiting for people to try it. The truth is that Bitcoin brings a highly disruptive force. It's a radical technology. It threatens the status quo. No wonder why the supporters of fiat are like waging a war against it.