If you are able to change your financial situation with Bitcoin, you will stick to your decision. You will do something people will stop you from doing but nobody will give you food when you are hungry. You have to move yourself forward so there is no point in thinking about who said what or who said bad things. I don't understand why the government stands in the way if bitcoin is going to provide employment to unemployed youth. Those who cannot find a job after completing their graduation should not be a hindrance if they can change their fortunes by investing or trading Bitcoin. There are many examples where Bitcoin is banned outright in their country but they are still using Bitcoin because they know that if they stop using Bitcoin they will not be able to earn the money they used to earn before.

 The government are threaten by the invention of this new technology, since the invention of this technology it has generated controversy and news mainly because they can’t control the market and use of bitcoin. Bitcoin enables the people to undermine government regulation and it can cause a serious problem to the financial infrastructure system and even destabilize it. If we want to look deep we’ll notice most of this government officials are large holders of Bitcoin.
  We should understand that one government does not have a mandate or right to overturn the use of bitcoin, the decentralization makes it difficult. The future of bitcoin is solely based on the people, unless the people decide not to participate in bitcoin then we can see the dissociation of bitcoin. Bitcoin will forever exist if the people accept it governmental bodies can only come after exchangers, this is why exchangers need to be extremely cautious about their dealings because the government are just looking for any slight mistake to be able to bounce on them. Without any good reason I don’t think governments will come for any exchangers that’s is clean from any fraudulent or malicious activity. Crypto exchanger should be extremely cautious about this cause the government are looking for possible ways to probe them and tag cryptocurrency as bad.

Everyone is free for Bitcoin investment but in most of the country there are severe control against Bitcoin and as you have mention that those who are born poor will die poor does not make a sense because according to my experience there were many individuals who were poor in their early ages but now they are most wealthy people. wealth comes with your hard work so that it can be true that if you born poor but you are hard working then your pority will end very soon everything is possible in life but if life exist.

But if we take this sentence as those who born poor without any money because babies have no money and a person also die poor because we cannot buried money with him so this sentence can be true.

Achieving financial freedom is possible with the Bitcoin investment therefore all of those who were poor but now invested some amount in Bitcoin then they will surely be wealthy in future .Actually to attain one's dream it is important that not be dependent on a single salary maybe it's a bitcoin or any other job because if you have a job and no Bitcoin investment then you cannot manage the expenses but if you have Bitcoin and don't have any job then how you will accommodate daily expenses because Bitcoin is unable to give you sudden profit.

agree on this.

can someone  help me accurately baseline the heat (BTU) production of the different machines?

I ask the question on this subject, as I feel that if crypto mining isn't made to be as sustainable as other capitalistic endeavors (aka industries) the "haters" (for lack of a better description of those peeps, that want to tear stuff down  because of deep seated fears of change or other BS reasons) are going to use against this industry when trying to tear it down/stop it/hold it back - just insert whatever word your comfortable with.   

With the BTU production, all industries that need heat can understand what containers full of miners means for low steam heat and other 'lighter industrial" applications.

Or an anaerobic digester that needs constant heat year round (upper midwest will see gensets used to capture the heat in the summer and boilers in the winter) for the collection of the methane.

Thanks,
Steven

Let me just correct you, there's no such quote as "Born Poor, Die Poor", The quote you're probably referring to goes "If you're born poor, that's not your fault, dying poor is". Which still sits well in the grand scheme of things bitcoin included. Bitcoin is the very technology that you can utilize to enjoy a more comfortable life. And I get it, I was one of the lucky few who banked on the bitcoin dream earlier than many of you guys here, reaped the benefits and learned from mistakes. But just because it's this great doesn't mean that governments who ban bitcoin are just selfish pricks that don't want their citizens to become wealthy, there is much concern revolving around bitcoin and crypto that it makes sense for some countries to ban its use.

For instance, we got the anonymity that can be used by hackers and scammers to fool people without getting caught, the fact that it can be used as a money laundering machine by corrupt people and officials, among other issues that leave some countries with no choice but to stop it from being used.

Maybe, At present bitcoin play as digital currency. Now if all countries legalize bitcoin then bitcoin will be the highest digital currency in future. Bitcoin is not yet legalized in all countries of the world. Moreover, Bitcoin has some limitations. By fixing technology and pricing constraints, Bitcoin can become a digital currency.

Bitcoin is appealing for its privacy and decentralization. It symbolizes financial autonomy and protects against government overreach. Lets not ignore the changing. The government cannot directly control Bitcoin, but it may influence its boundaries by regulating exchanges, taxing, and proposing central bank digital currencies. The goal is to adapt to a new financial paradigm, not only ban Bitcoin.

Consider the consequences of this tug-of-war. Bitcoin's decentralization is admirable, but governments wont stay silent. They're investigating blockchain integration into existing systems. This doesnt mean Bitcoin's demise; it just means we must stay vigilant and imaginative.

Future Bitcoin must balance goals with realities of a changing world. We must defend its principles while monitoring government change. Bitcoin's technology and our shared dedication to its values make it resilient.

1.Nobody "owns" blockchain technology. The people have ownership rights over the BTC in their wallets and the crypto miners have ownership rights over their mining hardware. The governments can confiscate the BTC in their wallets and their mining equipment. Nobody can tell when will the governments decide to confiscate the mining hardware or to ban BTC/crypto trading and mining completely.
2.I think that the saying was "If you are born poor it's not your fault, but if you die poor, this is definitely your fault."
3.Bitcoin isn't some miraculous magic financial tool, that will make you rich(even with education and hard work).

Even though Bitcoin can make someone rich, your assumption that Bitcoin will help everyone become rich is very wrong. in investing in bitcoin there will always be those who lose because of the wrong steps they take, if you don't have enough money to support your investment in bitcoin then it will be impossible for you to be able to have a lot of bitcoin which can make you rich.
so that poor people can change their lives through bitcoin, they must have good skills and patience, if you want to become an investor then you must have income in the real world and buy bitcoin using the DCA method and if you want to become a bitcoin trader you must have good skills in trading.
In fact, in order for you to be able to earn money from bitcoin paid campaigns, you must have the capital to buy a laptop or other device and also your patience in developing your account ranking so that you are worthy of joining bitcoin paid campaigns.
Bitcoin is the currency of the future and everyone has the opportunity to take advantage of it but still has to have capital (skills and money).

You're being quite selfish. Bitcoin isn't the only path to the success you're talking about. You can't force everyone's fortune into Bitcoin and treat it like a necessity. As long as it remains an easy-to-use alternative, its adoption will grow, and its value will naturally increase. Focusing on functionality and convenience should be considerations for Bitcoin before it can truly reach the level you envision as a money-maker.

Remember, Bitcoin isn't the key to wealth. It's a cryptocurrency that isn't fully accepted by all countries. So, Bitcoin still faces significant hurdles to truly have a better function or at least approach fiat in terms of adopters.

To become wealthy, we can't rely solely on Bitcoin. It's an option for those who enjoy speculation. If Bitcoin is so crucial for everyone worldwide, ETFs should have already announced SEC approval. As long as there are rejections from major institutions, it means there are still many considerations preventing widespread acceptance of Bitcoin.