Yeah obviously this is true that the high fee of Bitcoin will be one of the factors that will be a hurdle in the path of Bitcoin Global adoption because if we look at the current senario there are a lot of people who don't know how to avoid the high transaction fee, despite facing difficulty in transactions due to the high fee. And when new people take Bitcoin as payment, the idea of this high fee shakes them a little and makes them think that only an average transaction is also based on a high fee. I read an article in which an tweet informed me that a person paid a $15 fee for a $100 transaction. I think this is so bad and discusting for buddy that he pays so big fee on only a small transaction. If we look at it this is quite expensive for a person. 

Moreover, I think this is a big issue for Bitcoin enthusiasts and users that they pay too much high transaction fees for small transactions and @Hugblack your claim is right that the high fee will be a big problem for Bitcoin Global adoption in the future if they didn't seek any solution for him.

FCFS removed due to RBF
tier system removed when fee formulae removed years ago

a new fee formulae  can be implemented that punishes the junk spammers instead of punishing everyone. but core dont want to do that as its against their roadmap plan of offramping users to other networks

the junk spammers avoid mempool by pushing transactions through mining pool adjacent nodes through things like accelerators, bitcoin fibre and other portals.. so that when junk gets a cheap ride it makes it seem like the blocks are getting filled with cheap transactions.. but the core node method of estimating fee's for normal people that are delayed in mempools, show people paying those same fee's get delayed. thus causing congestion and fee replacement bidding wars

imagine it this way
a train station. but with two queues to get into a train carriage. a queue for white people with all their animated clothing being accelerated onto a train paying a minimum of 0.001/kb (10sat/byte)
then another queue of black people on a train mempool wait list. who may be paying the same minimum of 0.001/kb (10sat/byte). but left waiting even longer and being told to pay more or wait longer
the train looks like it lets passengers on for min fee's, but only the white people with their animated clothing

Your post was not individually deleted, but the entire thread was trashed.  You wont get a notice when stuff like that happens.

When you see suspicious posts like that, and  that one was clearly spam, it is best not to engage and instead report them to let the mods handle it and  we try to keep things positive here, so next time maybe take a second look before jumping in or just move on to more constructive discussions.

Also, if you continue with spreading misinformation and spamming, sooner or later you will be banned from further participation in this forum.

If you don't want to pay high transaction fee then you should just wait for the mempool get back to normal. Right now, the mempool is congested and as you can see there are lots of transactions and because of that, those people who can afford to pay higher transaction fee wouldn't mind to pay it just to make their transaction get confirmed faster. This is what I do when the fee gets higher and just have to wait before the transaction fee gets lower.

This was biggest issue faced by the bitcoin,but it was not because of the bitcoin.This was due to the exchange influence in the transaction fee of the bitcoin.As we know both the Binance and trust wallet headed by the same owner who keep the transaction fee of bitcoin high in both exchanges.So the small exchange also follows the same transaction fee,this leads to the transaction issue.The bitcoin decentralised behaviour was slightly reduced by this action by the owner of big exchanges.


This should be understood by the bitcoin traders,when ever the price of the bitcoin was increased.The transaction fee for the bitcoin also increased by the owner of the exchanges,but the trader should be responsible and don’t do the transaction of bitcoin at this time to avoid of losing the bitcoin.

The confirmation time is not proportional to fee. If the fee is below certain threshold, your transaction will probably never be confirmed. Like, if you put a 1 sat/vByte fee, it may never be confirmed if the fee will never be so low ever again, or if so much time will pass that the transaction will be removed from mempool by then.

There may be transactions that may seem absurd or pointless to you. Unfortunately, they, too, have as much right to use the network as you. The network is open for all to use. You pay the necessary fee, you can have your transaction processed. So, while many of us may think that one transaction is more important than another, what can we do? An actual Bitcoin payment may seem more important than sending a monkey jpeg, but if it pays a low fee in a congested network, it could be purged from the mempool while the monkey jpeg is smoothly confirmed.

But this is isn't because Bitcoin lacks decentralization. The opposite may be true. If transactions are screened and some are approved while others are not, censored for sending garbage images, that should be akin to centralization.

Why nonsense, my dear? Think about it if an economical fixed rate of fees was paid that would be profitable for miners and good for users at the same time.

This means that if a fixed percentage is set, for example $2-3 per transaction, it will be good for both parties, and in the future when the mining rewards decrease after each halving, this percentage can be increased to be profitable for the miners to continue their work.

That's a very wrong understanding on how Bitcoin transaction and decentralization work. The risk of high-fee when transaction amount is sky-rocketing is the risk of decentralization. More people want their transaction proceed so they are competing to raise the fee, miners is not the one who raised the fee, people who are transacting bitcoin are the one that raised the fee and the miners is happily benefiting from this issue. We all know why the transaction fee is skyrocketing, the network is bloated with all those ordinals and BRC-20, and no one/nothing interfere if this is what the most people want to do with bitcoin blockchain, that is because there is no central entity.

Thank you for discussing the idea in detail from all aspects.

There is no doubt that the Bitcoin mining/transaction/fee protocol was designed with ingenuity and high efficiency, but it may not have taken into account that transactions on the network will increase dramatically in the future. The current state of the network is a simple indicator of what could happen in the future if global adoption occurs and there are millions of  transactions on a daily basis. What's the solution? Do we just pay the insanely high fees?

I also wonder why other networks operate with high efficiency and great speed with low fees, such as the Binance network and the Tron network, even though they have large traffic and there are thousands of transactions carried out daily and do not cause congestion problems like those found on the Bitcoin network?