Actually , i dislike coingeek , there are some articles that worth reading from specific authors but many things written regarding csw are way over biased . I dislike Kurt Wuckert Jr too , he's the main reason is stopped getting information from coingeek some years back .


In a couple of months we will have an outcome , i'll just wait till then to come to a conclusion . I don't like throwing heretics on fire without a fair trial . Who knows , maybe a surprise is coming .

"Mηδενα πρo τoυ τελoυς μακαριζε" is a famous ancient greek quote , in english it's something common to the " It ain't over till the fat lady sings " .
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Croesus_and_Fate

If i'm wrong , who cares . But imagine what happens if i'm right . So , few months so you can officially declare me as a looney , have patience and get in the line .

I mean, even if the court said he was Satoshi, it'd seem more plausible as a scenario that the juries were bribed, or that Craig found a loophole in the law. It is beyond my understanding how can one throw away all the forgeries and evidence of him being completely untrustworthy, and stick to insignificant details-- which ultimately can apply to every individual.

Seems to me like you really want him to be declared as Satoshi, no matter how you argue the opposite. If you didn't, you'd have focused on the evidence and forgeries that have ridiculed him years now. If your stance was neutral, you'd have looked on both that evidence and his "evidence", and reach the conclusion we've all had. You must be personally interested in him winning the case to support him as his unofficial lawyer.

*One forged document

Of course we know that CSW has no real documents which he can use to prove he is Satoshi, so naturally he will try to submit fake ones. That's why expert witnesses are important, because they are able to call his bluff in a way that affects the court proceedings.

That is, assuming whoever is picked for an expert testimonial does not try to withhold evidence, to basically do what you just wrote.


Well at least he didn't believe that the plagiarism was caused by a "malfunctioning Microsoft Word editor"... JFC.

if you are reading ANYTHING from coingeek you already failed yourself. if you know enough about coingeek to know publishers names you know too much about them. by you admitting you previously relied on them and still read them. shows you are piling up on ketchup instead of gathering real sources(sauces)

as for your previous posts thinking CSW was smart and a candidate of satoshi due to intelligence. as hilariousetc just linked.. CSW not only used ghost writers to write his degree stuff, the stuff wrote were plagiarised. whole blocks of texts copy and pasted..  thus not showing any sign of individual intelligence/novel thinking.

he is cunning. has skills in forgery, but this does not translate to intelligence..
much like criminals have "street smarts" but get caught and put in prison.. does not translate to being smart enough to not get caught. they just have cunning to scam/steal enough to survive until caught. cunning is not equal to intelligence.
CSW is getting caught in court right now

I have also read hitler's mein campf and quran , i guess my hands should be chopped off as a punishment .

Hi, That is a good analogy.  I like your argument. The truth is far from this two parties pretending and debating of the fact if whether Dr CSW is Satoshi or Dr Fraud, This  arguments in the High Court in London is just a setup by Craig and the COPA organiser Jack Dorsey.

There is a hidden agenda of this case to file in London by COPA. They could have file the case in in US but they did not because they went no where in the Florida Case. So have chosen  London because, Satoshi Nakamoto is a British Economic scientist and he is a Londoner.

Tomorrow, there will be a twist. It is a twist of the Tricks of the Trade of the Bitcoin Drama.  

---

If Andreas Antonopoulos and Anthony Pompliano would have claimed to be Satoshi Nakamoto jointly then that could have been a reasonable claim. COPA is challenging Craig but there is secret deal going on between this two sponsored by a third party.  

No matter,  whatever would be the out come, for as far as I am sure the real Satoshi will not come out and Challenge Craig unless it is necessary.

Jesus fucking Christ this guy could've just given up with trying to prove that he's Satoshi Nakamoto and we would've been okay with it (well not really cause we'd roast and cook the fuck outta him for a while but it's gonna die down unlike what we're doing to him right now) But he keeps on making himself look like a massive clown in front of the jury and in front of the people. Like at this point you would've guessed he's already given up on trying to quell the haters but NOO, he's out for blood as a court ruling's gonna change how we look at his ugly mug.

You guys are both getting off on a tangent right here. The discussion's all about whether the clown is Satoshi or not (which let's be real here, he's not man) and we got Mr. 95% CSW believer right here trynna prove something. Whether he got his doctorate or not doesn't matter. What matters is that he doesn't even own a single satoshi until 2013 as most sources state and as franky iterated which is a telltale sign that he's not Satoshi. Like I'm so surprised that even after all the metaphorical pants-shitting that CSW Faketoshi has done in the past up until now (including the fact that his panel's using his mental impairment as an angle to gain the court's sympathy which is a massive wtf for me) you'd think he's not gonna garner anymore delulu believers but here we got HmmMAA contradicting his very own statements. C'mon folks.

You guys do not know anything about the Bitcoin and Blockchain Invention story.  None of you really know the true facts behind the emergence and the advent of the Decentralised Digital Electronic Cash System which its  so-called mysterious inventor has pioneered.  You have no clues of anything at all.  You have found the Bitcoin Forum and Bitcoin Core and Blockchain all of a sudden and many of you have become millionaires and Billionaires and enjoying life  what your great grandfather and father never imagined.  

Do not think that I am a teenage girl and have no technical or economic background. I wish I could have an audience with you all to discuss the matter in relation to Bitcoin and Blockchain and of course regarding our Dr Craig Wright and his so-called W&K Limited and BSV and also his claim of Satoshi Nakamoto Identity.

Craig Wright even is not Dr Craig Wright He is just a great actor, which few secret service agents and fiat financial elites together have recruited him   to act as an actor. Everybody knows that he has no programming background. He can only speak In Front of few people what he learned from DOCCO,

Do you really want Craig to retire from his bold claim of Satoshi Nakamoto without extraordinary and concrete  proof for an extraordinary claim ?  Then wake up men ! if you are man  enough to bring the real Satoshi Nakamoto on the spot.  Come forward !  I will produce the real Satoshi Nakamoto in the Court, who will establish Craig Wright's position in the place where he is supposed to be.

Ask a very simple question to yourself ?  the man who created the Digital Currency industry, is he so stupid and greedy who is allegedly holding 1.1Million Bitcoin and doing nothing, when a man like Craig Steven Wright is trying to re-hijack Bitcoin and Blockchain its intellectual property rights ?

You all are here in the forum bloody scaring cats and mice. You do not have any knowledge of the real Satoshi Nakamoto.  He will return soon and will punish all those who are abusing his Bitcoin and Blockchain and its monetary credibility. Also will be awarded to those who are doing good works.  It was the law, that Thou shall not Fork Bitcoin, you have done it. Now you are staging COPA -v- Craig Wright to break rules and bringing British Judicial Laws to break the Blockchain to grant Craig Wight the right to take over the Bitcoin and Blockchain industry ? No it won't happen.  

Craig should be happy to do business under a limit. He has crossed the limit. It is time to bring the real Satoshi Nakamoto in the Court. Who will be the Third Party in the COPA versus Craig Wright Case.  This will solves all the problems. Hundreds of Thousands of journalists and millions of people wasting billions of Hours to find Satoshi Nakamoto by writing articles.   I am convinced it is time for Satoshi Nakamoto to reveal his identity on 14 February 2024 instead of 14 Feb. 2020 which was blocked by the CoronaVirus Pandemic.  

The real Satoshi Nakamoto has already requested Justice Lord Mellor to grant him permission to attend the Court as a Third Party. Tomorrow 13 February 2024, I will Publish the Official Letter of Satoshi Nakamoto in this Forum.  You will find a link below and find it.  

 

  

As part of my contribution to providing updates on this court case between Dr. Wright and COPA, here are some excerpt from the last hearing and it is more on the case of forged documents brought forward to question the authentication of Dr. Wrights claim.
I however still doubt Dr. Wright is Nakamoto even if he has several documents to show he was among the originators of most of Bitcoin's technical initiative such as the P2p mode of transaction used.

More evidence will be provided soonest during the next court hearing, so am staying glued and making my observation known accordingly.

And as part of my contribution of providing a counter to FUD, I'll again point out that the source of these "updates" is a website run by people funding Wright's sad little campaign of lawsuits against this very community and its developers.  Anything from 'CG' is not to be trusted as it is a BSV shitcoin site, not a Bitcoin site.  People citing CG as a reputable source are not to be trusted.