Brushing your previous statement about small sign, to make it clear to you as I somehow get an impression that you think it is a minor issue, most gamblers actually seek that "small sign" when they access a gambling platform and would much prefer the ones with PF.

When a casino provide a PF claim in form of that logo, they're expected to be able to prove that their games [as the name suggested] are provably fair. It is not a simple statement, it is a commitment. There are instances where a game provider tweak their script and temporarily make their game non-PF, or where a provider actually can't provide a platform for player to verify their game. Upon being notified or coming to their own awareneness of this issue, the casinos that host games of these providers will immediately take that matter into their hand and see it through. And those casinos are big casinos.

Just to give you an idea how crucial and important of that "small logo" brings.

Moving on to your decision to remove the logo, I appreciate the move. Alternatively, you can make a distinct separation of PF game [your own game] with the ones that are not PF.

---

This coming from someone who barks at everyone to read the whole posts on his thread? Have you try to do your own suggestion? Because it seems you did not read every posts on this thread. If you do, you'll see that at least one of their game is PF.

Umm... have you read this post?

Hmm... yeah, we can understand what it means with one of it being provably fair as far as his memory serves him well, combined with a method of proving a fair bet by Eva. Have you read and try to understand it? Perhaps try to read it again and again? Still can't? Ok, here, let me help break it down to you:

You asked which game is PF, and that information was served to you, in form of a quote from past post, as it's been mentioned before, and should be known by someone who read the thread well. In short, the answer to your question, "why not tell everyone and also me which games are PF" is "their in-house games, namely "Blackjack" and "Red or Black", although "Red or Black" is a bit in doubt since it's currently inaccessible"

You get it now? Try to read it again slowly if you still can't. It's ok, we won't go anywhere, we'll still be here when you finished reading them and understand what it said.


Pretty much I covered this in your own thread?


Talking about IQ, actually, the post by khaled0111 as well as most of the posts on this thread and the situation regarding PF can be understood easily by anyone with average IQ. But I can understand that someone with the level of IQ like yours sometimes find it difficult to understand. After all, one can seriously injure themselves if they climb to the height of your ego and jump to the level of your IQ. [Yep, that's me being a clown and make a joke]

yawn.  Everyone knows what you did bozo.   Do you really not remember?  (see my sig)

No one should be scared of being OG's next target - now is the time to stand up!

I would've quit Bitcointalk by now but seeing this drama still continue is the biggest reason why I'm still around. I will try to be here for every moment of this.

Thank you so much holydarkness for attempting to solve it! This means a lot.

Regarding the Blackjack Tournaments, let me please explain the whole concept. We have decided to build our "baby" together with our community. Our brightest blackjack players are shaping our product from scratch, right from the very early stage. This means that it is completely fine to have millions of bugs because it is not a ready product, and no player is taking any risks. Currently, it is not possible to place any bets with real money. So, it is entirely acceptable. Discussing the bugs is not relevant because that is the whole concept. A partially completed product is live on the site simply to grant access to our community members.

Eva

That's good. That's what I have asked like five times already and it seems you answered it now by mistake when another user mentioned it. 

Can you provide some more information about this? Is your previous statement still true for this "partially completed product?" Can players wager real money on the live game?

I don't see the point. You have admitted to using the exploit to your advantage several times. Why would they prove you did it when you said you did? I am sure the bug is still there. What Eva is doing is what you would expect a representative to do who protects their business. They are not going to admit there is anything wrong with the product despite them knowing about it. They are not going to go into details about what is wrong. And, when you point out the faults, they will be surprised and tell you it's the first time they hear about it. It's standard marketing bullshit to look good in the public's eyes. Don't pay attention to it.

I can't believe you actually make me agree with JPR, that you barely answer anything.

Initially, the purpose of this thread, before other issues raised, like license and PF, is for you to defend yourself against unjust attack, namely JPR keeps accusing you on his thread that you scam him [this part is still baseless and he can't clarify which part is scam] and that your bug is still there. And your answer above is as vague as JPR's explanation about how you scammed him.

Even if it's true that no one can bet with real money on that game, and the chance of losing any fund from that game is somewhat nonexistent, it does not diminishes the purpose of that game, or this thread. As you state it yourself, you want to raise a "baby" with your community, and give them an opportunity to build something together. And here is someone [disregarding his ego and IQ] that pointed out a flaw to make sure that it will run smoothly in the future, and yet you're seemingly reluctant to give a clear answer of the real condition of that "baby".

Risking to sound redundant, may I remind you that the main purpose of this thread is to give you a space to defend yourself against JPR? One of the easiest way to tackle his accusations is to address it. Which you're yet to do. So, here we are, to make it simple, related to JPR's accusation of bug, if you can answer this with a yes or no, it will be very much appreciated: has that particular bug [time exploit] be fixed?.