distributed ledgers .... governments
These two concepts can not even be mentioned in the same sentence. Distributed ledger demands decentralization while governments are all about centralization.
In any case I disagree with the subject here, [decentralized] blockchain technology has no use for governments and can not change them at all. And as I skimmed through the article my opinion didn't change. The article simply doesn't have any justification for any of the random examples it uses (eg. using it for land registry, healthcare, etc.).
You see it is not about explaining possibility of doing something with a tool, it is all about explaining WHY.
Read the Bitcoin whitepaper (again if you have already). In there Satoshi doesn't
only explain how this new payment system works. He
also explains why Bitcoin should even exist, and most importantly what problems it solves.
Take land registration using blockchain technology (which so far has only meant injecting an arbitrary data into bitcoin blockchain through OP_RETURN and still use the same centralized database to verify these), what problem does that solve? Why isn't the current centralized system not working? What is its flaws and how does using the most inefficient form of database aka a blockchain solving those issues?
These are the questions they never answer. They just use some pretty words and some buzzwords about a new technology trying to solve everything with it without knowing why or how.
The article being old is proof that this is all empty words by people who neither understand the technology nor understand the problem they claim to be solving.