oh for sure - I get it and the math is easy to calculate. I personally would still prefer keeping it simple and using only the block hash on its own - if no winner, then next block. Seems more fair and more simple to me.
I'm not sure that the simpler way is "if no winner, then next block." if no winner again, then next block... I have seen similar raffles where several blocks were needed.
bitmover's tool is also provably fair
It's probably a matter of habit, you've been used to using one method for years.
no it isnt that at all - it is as I stated, I want, when I do a raffle myself, the winning number to be the actual number the contestants chose, not some number that gets calculated using the block hash.
It is not a big deal to wait for a next block either.
and I am not opposed to others doing it another way for their raffles - as long as it is specified and verifiable, which this was and is.