Why give attention to a rich banker? Their existence is incompatible with anything Bitcoin stands for.

Some people will not see what is right all because they are old fashion people. Even when bitcoin was low in price, there were many critics including Warren Buffett and Peter sheriff and many of them, but bitcoin has let us know that these people are only just not knowing what is right about bitcoin. Probably they do not want to invest because they have other means of income but that does not mean that they are not all wrong. All I know is that bitcoin is a store of value.

Someone like him can say whatever thing he likes, that's why we don't have to believe people all times in what they are saying, another can come up tomorrow saying bitcoin is water or air, ours is to know and understand what the master plan on every bit for has been why bitcoin was created, we may not have to listen to so many distractions, some are just there to makentheir own fame through thuis and gain recognition with bitcoin by what they say.

JPMorgan has a long history of changing their statements, and the institution is indirectly invested in Bitcoin, and banks and cash are the basis for most illegal activities compared to Bitcoin, so we can only consider Jamie Dimon’s opinions as biased personal opinions and not supported by any evidence or proof.

He says that he defends the right to smoke as he defends the right to buy bitcoin which can only mean that he doesn't mind us buying bitcoin but we need to stay away from him. With that kind of statement, I think that it's a really good idea to recommend him to stop yapping about bitcoin because ain't no way that people ever cared about his statement and his words about not investing or being convinced that bitcoin is a thing is as empty as his soul, it don't mean anything for him or any of us because even if he doesn't invest in bitcoin, he's still a rich self-centered attention seeking annoying goblin so to the people that are still caring about what this hoodlum in a suit says, it's high time that you stop doing that because the less people that care about what he has to say about bitcoin, the less he's becoming relevant, the reason that he's probably this way anyway is because he wants the exposure and ire of the bitcoin community not to mention that it also generates his company some exposure.

But.. that's actually a great take though?

He'd personally wouldn't own bitcoin, but he supports everyone's financial freedom to purchase things they believe in. Why are the responses to this thread so negative despite the neutral(but very reasonable) stance? Read the freakin article, don't just read the headline looool.

As much it's a great take, I still don't think that it's worth your time to listen to this kind of thing or maybe even learn what he wants to talk about, he's not a great role model for us investors anyway and I don't think that he's the type to follow if you want good advice because I feel like this is the kind of guy that would probably lead you astray even if you're genuinely asking the right questions.

if blocks were meat the best natural way to preserve blocks is to smoke it
smoked meat is better for you than other preservation methods

dont get salty, smoke it

Thanks.

When I was a newbie, I felt cool to read what big men, rich men said but with time, many years in this market, I understood more about how politicians lie, billionaires lie only for their own benefits.

By understanding this fact, I focus more on myself and because I am a Bitcoin investor, I focus more on learning fundamentals about Bitcoin, advanced things and weakness of global economics, national currencies so that my belief in Bitcoin and its future continue to rise more and more. That's it.

Now I see funny when I read such news.

I swear to god these folks are still going to be telling people "Don't buy bitcoin" even after it reaches $1,000,000.