From who? You? Hahaha! Laughable.


Is that the truth, or are you gaslighting/making things up again, frankandbeans? Because by saying that through a written post, and making everyone believe that to be true, could be considered libel.


Is this 4D Chess? You're making false statements against your mentors for me to defend them? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

You have no mentors, but merely propagating the lies and the disinformation of people that have an Anti-Bitcoin agenda. OK.

There should be no mentors, we merely should know which group of people we should learn from. They're not always right, they're human, but I have full confidence that they're not nefarious. There are also big blockers that I respect, like Deadalnix. The direction he wants for Bitcoin's development may be different, but he isn't a liar. He's not like you.

Plus who should the newbies of BitcoinTalk learn from? You? Or the those people who gave you the red color in your trust-rating?

you keep mentioning the trust rating.. its meaningless because your group of idiots caused it

people should learn from actual blockdata, code and understanding of bitcoin.. not some idiot group of social drama queens like your silly cult and their agenda. i dont want suck-ups either im not looking to form a fanbase of people trusting me either, people should do their own research and learn the facts..

as for the trust rating:
the debates 8+ years ago that heightened over the years into discourse, is that i kept informing people that segwit will/did/has triggered an exploit that allows JUNK DATA
and guess what.. years later ordinals proved my case

also the promises of segwit being the solution to allow more transactions on the bitcoin network were fake/broken/empty promises
because many devs even back in 2010 said that bitcoin can handle over 4000tx... and yet in 2024 we are still not going way above 4k tx average. even when blocks are 4x of the satoshi days.. meaning we should be averaging or expecting 16k but nope still at 4k average(and less)

now go do your research and realise the biggest idiot you idolise(doomad) was the biggest cry baby wanting me moderated and banned from this forum because i kept correcting him.

even your rhetoric of "big blocker" is not even a thought of your own its the implications made by doomad that you blindly recite that those calling out on CORES short comings must be some "big blocker" group. where there is an attempt of social drama to pidgeon hole anyone not religiously following core like god/idols must be some altcoin group
you shamefully do not even think that me and thousands of people are discussing bitcoin scaling. which is not the rhetoric you blindly think it is.
so go learn what real bitcoin scaling is and stop just reciting silly rhetoric from a group of idiots that have been debunked many times via data and code(real source information). bitcoin scaling is not "big blocker" exaggerations..
bitcoin scaling is not "idolise core as central government or f**k off to another network"
learn what bitcoin scaling actually is

i dare you to try and find some REAL mis information i gave and show me hard data, code that proves your case
realise something upfront though
all your belligerent posts of using insults you cant even come up with yourself but using doomads words and references, are just copies of doomads silliness and i have already debunked his mindset of how he thinks of things like consensus and segwit.. so actually do some proper research before you post because if you just want to recite doomad rhetoric, you will instantly loose

try to learn for once to not trust people blindly/unchecked.. and instead use data and code as your source of bitcoin information. trusting a mentor like you had admitted even in your post.. shows you are not ready to learn bitcoin and instead just want to play social games of trusting cult players
and just reciting silly stories that earn you the title of also being called an idiot by showing your repeated idiocy

so take some time to actually do some research away from doomads rhetoric. and please dont just reply acting like a victim refusing to learn or pretending you have learned things from idiots or crying that i call them idiots.. actually be prepared to learn or stop playing your cultish games. dont cry about it

your cultish games and social drama's are as bad as CSW's games.. stop being a copycat.. and no dont pretend your copycat tactics are actually your own independent idea's... as it really would be you doing a CSW

I laughed when he was found to have used ChatGPT and altered PDFs. He has degrees in computer science but doesn't understand metadata.

We're idiots because we listen to those two people, Gregory Maxwell and A. Chow both Bitcoin Core Developers, that have given you those two negative trust-ratings? But you're not because you listen to your mentor Roger Ver? You also try to bring Craig Wright in the conversation, but the only person that spreads lies, disinformation, and gaslights like him is you ser.

No, frankandbeans. In the context of that post of yours, you mentioned Craig Wright because you're trying to tell everyone that some users in BitcoinTalk and myself are "playing the same games as CSW". But who has the negative trust-rating given by BOTH Core Developers? Should everyone believe you or them?

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Is your cult one of the fun ones with lots of orgies and free love? Or one of the boring ones that we sit around chanting for inner calm?

Looking for something to do this summer since it looks like my motorcycle is going to be in for warranty work for the foreseeable future and a free love orgy cult sounds like fun.

Anyway, I don't know all the ins and outs of the courts on the other side of the Atlantic, but here in the US there really is no way to go back and say you didn't say something in a civil trial. You said it, it's on you, and people suing you can use it against you with just about 0% possibility of you being able to dispute it.

-Dave

I believe not. He has been playing 4D Chess with Jonald Fyookball in the forum BEFORE the existence of Craig Wright was known. The proof in his trust-rating.

He also admitted it.


In fact, he also told me that it was Nick Szabo who introduced Craig Wright as the "real Satoshi" during one of the conferences. That was enough 4D Chess for me. Plus I'm wearning my tin-foil hat every time is see frankandbeans.

i had my opinions on core being a central point of failure BEFORE CSW and jonald ..
thats not an admission of being part of some altnetwork group.. thats called independent research and scrutiny
when idiots like CSW and jonald then copied what i said i called them out on it.. yep they are idiots too..

im not looking to form a group. im not part of a group. i dont like nor tolerate nor want ass-kissers.. i dont want mindless zombies copying stuff without understanding it.. people should do their own research and not sound like zombie copy/paste reciting idiots
im not interested in other networks nor promote people should move to other networks(unlike the doomad/windfury group, that sound more like CSW games)

as for windfurys failing to understand logic reason, research, data, fact and history
if he did do his research he will see CSW first appearance publicly in the cryptosphere was not the signing session with gavin.. not the self doxing and running away to the UK. it was months earlier in 2015 at a conference nick szabo was at.
(CSW was skype called live-streamed in on a big screen)
most peoples interest in that conference was due to nick szabo being there, he was the lead guest of interest. CSW was an unknown entity but then treated as secondary lead guest.
the host bitcoinbabe made an article later about her regrets of hosting that conference with CSW in it.. where she says CSW had been previously introducing himself to the big players of crypto and the big names like nick szabo and trying to mingle and get associated with and recognition via trying to get close to the big names(during 2015),
which she then thought he was a big player worthy of being in the conference panel due to the association he wiggled his way into of certain others like nick szabo
if it wasnt for CSW name dropping nickszabo as a contact he would not have been on the panel with nick szabo

i call this crap out because this crap needs to be called out as a way showing history of events.. now go do your research
yep CSW was trying to mingle and wedge his way into bitcoin ecosphere/recognition before he doxxed himself and moved to the UK
CSW first bitcoin purchase was 2013 and first appearance was oct 2015 before the self doxing to media in december 2015
the public had no opinion of CSW before oct 2015
CSW had no bitcoin association, relevance, participation, recognition earlier then this

so i did not form my opinions around stuff CSW said nor had personal contact with CSW.. so windfury trying to pretend im associated with CSWthe scammer are where windfury gets its all wrong

when CSW done the signing thing and published it. i even was trying to tell people the signature was a fake, where it was pulled from publicly available blockdata and not a real newly signed thing soon after CSW published it. i was calling out CSW as fake early on

windfury just hates having his gas enlightened and hates getting burned so then wants to pretend people that burn him with enlightened facts must be part of some alternate group
windfury wants to confuse things and re arrange history purely because doomad does, and its their gameplan to be like CSW and promote some other network(LN) as bitcoin that they think people should move over to it if peoples dont like cores business plan
they are the ones that sound like CSW and emulate him

Highly educated people can still be emotionally unstable or they simply think they are better than other people. (They call that an inflated ego or just arrogance)

We have a few highly educated family members in my broader family and some of them do not mix with the rest of the family, because they think that they are in a different class and that their shit does not stink. A lot of their social lives are in a mess, but they keep up a fake front to protect their own inflated ego.

CW thought he was the smartest guy in Crypto currency, but he was proven wrong by people that were smarter than him. He did fool Gavin and some fanboys, but the truth and facts exposed him.