The condition of his bail include:
(1) prevented from engaging in any cryptocurrency transactions, directly or indirectly, without prior approval from the court.
(2) travel restricted to parts of New York and Pennsylvania when not confined to his home.
The first condition of his bail seems insane, he is restricted from engaging in any cryptocurrency transactions, even indirectly. The US government will be like a hawk at the moment keeping an eye on his cryptocurrency assets. It's a sad day, the US is not a safe place for cryptocurrency holders.
How enforceable is his conditions of bail, and what are your thoughts on it?
What precedent does this bail condition set for the future of cryptocurrency and Bitcoin projects founded from the USA?
if an american was found to be laundering euros, yen or rupees then its not insane to prevent them using directly or indirectly other currencies/forex
if caught using such their bail could be revoked and he placed in custody/jail til trial
its not precedent its just same laws that apply to other currency crimes also not excluded from bitcoin
many people think by using bitcoin creates some immunity from fiat laws.. sorry to inform you but normal laws still apply no matter what the currency is
'bitcoin projects' oh come on we all know the use of certain things are for mixing and mixing is even promoting itself as a use for laundering
no need to obfuscate it and pretend its just a 'bitcoin project', pretending this case puts all bitcoin projects under threat, the obvious clarity of this case shows it relates to mixing and laundering.. so why do people here try masquerading it as a general threat of all bitcoin utility, when in fact its clear its targeted directly for laundering/mixing