As far as I understand no one usually wants to go against the bank the problem is that the bank seems to be hesitant to adopt its policies. Listening to many people seems to have lost confidence in policy making. Banks have made their own work easier by doing one policy today changing that policy tomorrow.

I don't see this to be useful, judging trust because someone holds Bitcoin is a turn off, and seeing holders as anti-government or against bank policies is a wrong view. Wether or not we like it we are still under the government rules, the originality of Bitcoin wasn't to go against bank policies or government but was also an alternative process for transactions. In essence we should all limit our extensions to government and bank policies.

Bitcoin  was never and won't be Anti - Government.

Well, I am a Bitcoin holder so I did want to say we are not all like this. I am not anti governments and I am not anti banks. I do trust in myself for this reasons. We have to be very patient with our Bitcoin.

I do like what Bitcoin does have to offer. But I do not want to to overpower the powerful governments and the banking systems in this world.

It's really confusing because even in my country the government just see Bitcoin and Bitcoin holders as some kind of threat to their system of which is a false idealogy, Bitcoin holders are just like the regular fiat holders just that in their own case they are the ones in charge of everything that has to do with their money which is kind of a threat since the government only works when the massive are controlled and manipulated to their will and desire and it's just so good that Bitcoin doesn't have any owner if not by now they would have conditioned or sanction him in a way that Bitcoin will be terminated.

I am involved in investing in Bitcoin and I am holding Bitcoin for a long time and I will hold my investment in a more long-term plan so there is nothing to distrust those who hold Bitcoin because I am involved in this work myself. What you said is that Bitcoin is anti-government in most of the countries in those countries instead of approving Bitcoin they promote various negative aspects about Bitcoin. It's not unusual to promote like this because when you transact through Bitcoin without going through a bank, the central bank will definitely suffer some financial loss which no government wants. If all the transactions are done through the bank, in this case the bank and the economic condition of that country will be good enough. But if you think bitcoin transactions are more acceptable than banks, you can trade bitcoins and hold bitcoins.

I agree with you @BABY SHOES We are not anti-government and in fact we must obey government regulations that apply in each country and are also not anti-bank because it is true what you said that we really need banks for our needs. and if we stay away from the government or banks, of course that is a mistake because in my opinion, no matter what, we need banks and the government.

and of course quite a few governments also benefit from people who invest in bitcoin because in my country the government benefits from exchange taxes and in essence bitcoin has a positive impact on everyone and benefits a lot.

I personally also agree with you, yes, I also believe in the potential of bitcoin and of course bitcoin is a promising digital asset and of course bitcoin holders have the potential to gain profits. And what's unique about Bitcoin is that it has its own controls, yes, there are many other features that Bitcoin has. But of course there is always a risk of investing in BTC, but what is clear is that knowledge must be prioritized before getting involved in the world of Bitcoin.

Why do you think bitcoin holders are anti-government? No they are not. Bitcoin holders do complain about the government just because the government and the banks are against bitcoin, and we know that they are doing it just for their own selfish interests, they are making people believe that bitcoin is bad and that it is only used by scammers, which is very wrong. Banks are against bitcoin because they know it’s going to kill their business. People now prefer to leave their money in bitcoin rather than keep it in banks, which is why banks are against bitcoin. So I do trust bitcoin holders, and they are not anti-government, they are just fighting for bitcoin.

We have been watching Bitcoin for years. If we look at the past history of Bitcoin we can see that those who hold Bitcoin have lost and they have made huge profits. If holding it should be done long term. Never panic investing in Bitcoin. Those who can hold Bitcoin tight I believe can gain a lot from Bitcoin. There is no chance of not trusting Bitcoin holdings.  Because no one has been disappointed by holding Bitcoin so far

How do you mean by do you trust Bitcoin holders? You need to understand that any person that have Bitcoin even though it is a small portion is a Bitcoin holder. Do you intend to be a Bitcoin holder? Because I still don't understand why you think that looks like u trusted cryptocurrency. No matter your opinion or what you think about Bitcoin, the price will keep surging and more investors would always be ready to buy and hold Bitcoin. There are different ranges of holders which includes whales, sharks and many others in the market. You can also decide to be a Bitcoin holder if you don't trust other holders.