Anyone is free to create a fork of Bitcoin to disable/enable anything they want in the software. But do you think miners/mining pools will support such a chain? (Or at least most of them?) What would be the incentive for them to do so?

They joined Bitcoin blockchain with their Inscriptions which are useless because they smelt chance to make hypes and get benefit with Bitcoin blockchain.

They know that if they hard fork Bitcoin blockchain to have a new chain that supports Inscriptions, their Inscriptions will die very quickly. The hard fork to block Inscriptions on Bitcoin blockchain will be good for Bitcoin users who dislike Inscriptions.

I feel uncertain that will this create argument as such hard fork to block something is a type of censorship that was not Satoshi Nakamoto's vision.

Eventough a hardfork is always a strain on the community, i have to say that a hardfork solving this mempool flood would be interesting. I'd defenately think solving the mempool congestion with those inscription thingies would be a better cause than the last "big" hardfork (BCH).

If such a fork would exist, i'd think it would have a reasonable chance of getting adopted by the majority (depending on how many of the core dev's were willing to switch to said fork).
If enough users adopt the fork, miners would eventually switch since big adoption usually means an OK FIAT value, and eventough the block reward is getting lower, money could still be made mining the "new" fork. Personally, i think it would be great being able to make a transaction that doesn't need 200 sats/vbyte to have a decent chance of getting confirmed in the next couple of blocks... I'd also think it would be a good idear if the nodes didn't have to fill their disks with nonsense data when they store the blocks.

And censorship? What censorship? Those inscription thingies could still exist in the "old" chain. If they want to keep filling blocks with their data, they can do so, just not on the "new" chain... If somebody wants a chain to store even more ridiculous stuff, they can make their own fork, and if they gain some adoption, they have a network and they can store whatever they want... I don't see creating a hardfork to see if it gains adoption as censoring.

I'm not saying it's a good idear per sé, i'm not saying i would blindly follow such a fork, i'm just saying that such a fork would probably have more merit than BCH, and eventough BCH did not gain the biggest part of the community, it does still exist.

You will find a more detailed discussion about disable inscription ----->  (Ordinals) BRC-20 needs to be removed
The bottom line is that we may have negative or positive opinions about Ordinals, but in the end, the decentralization of the network means accepting opinions that differ from yours as long as they are compatible with the protocol.
The main problem is the high transaction fees, for which we see that there are lengthy discussions without ideal solutions.

We have seen it already, a hard fork could divide many people involved in Bitcoin like the developers and the miners and other player. So it's not the solution to have a fork and obviously it will not be the original Bitcoin that Satoshi developed. And for all we know, I think Bitcoiners by now learn to accept this inscriptions and those who try to sabotage the network and it seems that we are not affected by it. Currently, fees around 20 sat/vB could be the new norm for us, and for sure Bitcoin developers have seen the issues already and well aware of.

The only problem I have with ordinals is the higher transctoin fee on Bitcoin network, so if there is a chance that they can make this happen why not use this for something better? Ordinals shouldn't be getting all this attention right now, make Bitcoin better instead.

In few years time ordinals and all inscriptions can face an amount and like most altcoins always do, maybe no one will talk about them or have interest in them anymore? This is my believe, it is only a fool that will leave Bitcoin and choose to invest in inscriptions, I don't have one even when I know that the present investors can make a lot of money from it.

Looks more like the fools game to me, let's see how long this will last, it could exist in the next few years but the interest will be lot lower than it is right now.

How long will it take until the Bitcoin community accepts Ordinals as an inevitable outcome of a decentralized, censorship-resistant network? Regardless of what we do, there is always a way to bypass it. Treating addresses as chunks of arbitrary data is just one way.

It is easy to implement a rule that will make these particular transactions non-standard. The thing is: it doesn't invalidate them. The Ordinal users can still broadcast them to mining pools, and miners can still mine them normally. The only difference is that some upgraded nodes won't accept them in their mempool.

You can do anything you like.  The question you should be asking is if the rest of us would be prepared to follow you, or whether you're doing it on your own.

For me, personally, I wouldn't be following the tyrannical fork which is attempting to control what people can or can't do.  I can fully appreciate why people would like to prevent inscriptions, but for me, it's a slippery slope towards other varieties of censorship.  I want no part of that, but wish you the best of luck in your endeavours.

Sadly this to me is the reality we are facing right now, before the security of bitcoin network network was the aim of the community or developers right now it’s all about the how to make the miners more happy about getting more incentives. Although the reward for mining a block is reducing, but wouldn’t that at least take more years to complete be worthless with the potential that bitcoin price will grow in demand and subsequently more price of there is more adoption (high fees will certainly decrease that).

My only security concern about removing this inscriptions is that wouldn’t that at least affect our decentralization where nodes can every day make changes to the network even those that wouldn’t suit the community. But if there is no security risk then nothing much to worry about.